TEST:

Oncomine™ Dx Target Test

"Thermo Fisher Scientific...has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its Ion Torrent Oncomine Dx Target Test as a companion diagnostic (CDx) to identify patients eligible for treatment with Servier Pharmaceuticals, LLC’s VORANIGO (vorasidenib) tablets. VORANIGO is an isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with Grade 2 astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma with a susceptible IDH1 or IDH2 mutation following surgery including biopsy, sub-total resection or gross total resection...Today’s approval expands clinical indications for the Oncomine Dx Target Test, which is currently approved and reimbursed by government and commercial insurers in 19 countries, including the U.S., Japan, South Korea and countries across Europe and the Middle East, covering more than 550 million lives globally."

Based on the genomic analysis, we treated the patient with brigatinib, an ALK inhibitor. We describe here a patient with LCNEC who responded significantly to brigatinib without serious adverse events.

Objective: In 2022, the OncomineTM Dx Target Test (ODxTT) was approved in Japan as a companion diagnostic for selecting patients eligible for selpercatinib for advanced thyroid cancer, introducing a multigene test for thyroid cancer... A total of 571 patients were enrolled. There were 357 women (62.5%) and 214 men (37.5%) with a mean age of 65.9 ± 14.2 years. Four hundred and 18 (73.2%) were papillary carcinoma (PTC), 56 (9.8%) follicular carcinoma (FTC), 31 (5.4%) poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDTC), 38 (6.7%) anaplastic carcinoma (ATC), 21 (3.7%) medullary carcinoma (MTC), and 7 (1.2%) others.

Response duration was 12.0 and 9.3 months for patients identified by the ODxT Test and CTAs, respectively, in DESTINY-Lung01. The ODxT Test detected HER2 mutations in NSCLC with high analytical and clinical accuracy and identified HER2m populations with response rates similar to populations identified by CTAs, supporting clinical utility of the ODxT Test to inform treatment decisions for HER2m NSCLC.

Sensitivity and scenario analyses revealed that the test success rate of Oncomine DxTT affected the results. The genetic test using Oncomine DxTT before the first-line treatment is not cost-effective compared with the three single-gene tests (EGFR/ALK/ROS1) for patients with advanced/recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC.

We made a diagnosis of another primary adenocarcinoma from the left S1+2 nodule (cT1bN3M0, c-stage IIIB) with MET mutation, and changed osimertinib to capmatinib. The temporal and spatial heterogeneity reinforces the need for primary tissue biopsy if dual primaries are suspected. Temporally distinct liquid biopsies, not standard at present, may be considered.

Postoperative recurrence cases, even among the driver+ population, demonstrated a favorable prognosis compared to advanced cases. The widespread evaluation of driver mutations through multiplex testing is needed.

Conclusions : The integration of ODxTT alongside single gene tests provides significant additional information without compromising the performance of single gene tests. With ODxTT's high success rate, this integration expands the scope of comprehensive therapeutic strategies for advanced lung cancer.

Our findings suggest that tepotinib has comparable therapeutic effects in patients with METex14 skipping-positive NSCLC irrespective of the concordance of results between ODxTT and ArcherMET. Tepotinib is a possible treatment option for patients with METex14 skipping, even in patients with discordant test results.

The ODxTT missed two uncovered EGFR rare variants, which was visually confirmed in the raw sequencing data. Our study provides insights into real-world performance of CDx tests for lung cancer and ensures reliability to advance precision medicine.

A total of 1,418 EGFR E20ins mutations were collected from six studies (FoundationInsights, Geneseeq Technology Inc, mobocertinib phase I/II trial, poziotinib phase II trial, sunvozertinib phase I trial, and Samsung Medical Center) and reorganised according to Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature. To ensure comprehensive coverage in real-world settings, it is essential to standardise the annotations for each variant, for example using the HGVS nomenclature. The accurate classification and analysis of drug responsiveness in EGFR E20ins necessitate consideration of the nomenclature, particularly with respect to the locations where the actual mutations occur.

"The detection rate of driver oncogene alterations for all histologies was 52.4% (111/212), and that for adenocarcinoma was 69.7% (106/152). A favorable submission rate and success rate of multi-gene panel tests were shown, along with a favorable detection rate in recent clinical settings."

We report a rare case of selpercatinib use for MMFCC. Since RET mutations may occur frequently in MMFCC, selpercatinib could be effective in treating MMFCC.

The AmoyDx PLC panel, a PCR-based multiplex diagnostic test, exhibits a high success rate. The frequency of the nine genes targeted for treatment detected by the AmoyDx PLC panel was comparable to the frequency of mutations detected by ODxTT-M. Clinicians should understand and use the AmoyDx PLC panel and ODxTT-M with respect to their respective performances and limitations.

"Bayer AG and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc...announced to develop next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based companion diagnostic assays (CDx) together. These will help identify patients who may benefit from Bayer’s growing portfolio of precision cancer therapies by offering decentralized genomic testing and rapid turnaround time...The CDx will be developed using Thermo Fisher’s Oncomine Dx Express Test on the Ion Torrent Genexus Dx System, a fully integrated NGS platform that can deliver results on a patient’s tumor or liquid biopsy sample in as little as 24 hours."

This study highlights the benefits of combining morphological and immunohistochemical analyses for gene detection and posits that lymph node metastases are more suitable for genetic analysis owing to their mild calcification. Our results emphasize the importance of accurate sample processing in diagnosing and treating thyroid carcinomas.

Even if sufficient tumor samples are obtained, rare EGFR mutations (which are excluded from the ODxTT's genetic mutation list) might not be detected using the current ODxTT system due to the program used for sequence analysis. However, such rare EGFR mutations can still be accurately detected on ODxTT's sequence data using next-generation sequencing.

The 6 AV studies met the necessary product requirements and acceptance criteria to detect clinical samples with ERBB2 mutations. Additionally, the CV study clinical accuracy and clinical efficacy results demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the use of the ODxTT in FFPE samples as an aid to identify NSCLC patients eligible for treatment with the Daiichi Sankyo lung cancer therapeutic T-DXd.

On September 29, 2023, the FDA granted companion diagnostic approval to the Oncomineâ„¢ Dx Target Test (ODxT Test) as an aid in the selection of patients with BRAF V600E-mutated ATC who may be eligible for treatment with dabrafenib in combination with trametinib. The ODxT Test was shown to be effective in identifying BRAF V600E mutations in ATC patients through a clinical concordance study using specimens from patients enrolled in the ROAR trial and commercially-sourced samples. The results support the expanded indication to the ODxT Test and marks the first FDA-approved NGS-based companion diagnostic for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated ATC.

These findings suggest that while both CDx tests are effective in detecting almost all actionable EGFR mutations, ODxTT provides slightly broader coverage. These results emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate CDx tests to inform treatment decisions for EGFR-positive NSCLC patients.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ddCq and ΔCq as significant predictors of DNA and RNA NGS success rates, respectively. Quality assessment of nucleic acid extracted from archival tissue samples is important for achieving high NGS success rates in clinical practice, especially for samples ≥3 years old.

This study shows a clear difference between AD and NFAD in terms of cancer progression, pathological features of the main tumor, genetic characteristics, and PD-L1 expression.

Furthermore, genetic mutations were detected in 39 of 112 cases (35 %) in group A and 59 of 102 cases (58 %) in group B, which was statistically higher in group B (P = 0.0006). Genetic mutations were detected in 45 of 55 adenocarcinoma cases in group B. The genetic mutations detected in epidermal growth factor rescepor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) were higher in group B. Increasing the number of tumour cells and tumour content can enhance the detection rate of genetic mutations using ODxTT.

No abstract available

Conclusions The success rate of ODxTT on EBUS-TBNA specimens were 90%. It is expected to yield specimens of sufficient quality and quantity to perform ODxTT and may be an important diagnostic option in lung cancer cases with enlarged lymph nodes.

The patient was treated with osimertinib after progression on chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab, and a partial response was maintained for more than 20 months. To predict EGFR-TKI efficacy, confirmation of gene mutations and VAF using next-generation sequencing is helpful.

Overall, these findings suggest that the slow-pull method is a superior technique for EBUS-TBNA to obtain high-quality tissue samples for NGS. The slow-pull method may contribute to the identification of driver gene mutations and translocations and facilitate personalized treatment of NSCLC.

However, among the other three discordant cases harboring the mutations reportable by the ODxTT, only one patient had a clinical response with short duration. Among the discordant cases for common EGFR mutations between the ODxTT and the conventional single gene test, there are a certain number of suitable patients responsive to EGFR-TKIs, especially when the cause of the discordant results comes from the difference in the range of detectable variants that are reportable between the tests.

Our findings indicate that a TS of ≥4000 is a feasible and relevant criterion for ODxTT testing, and its adoption should help to improve the success rate of such testing in clinical practice.

[Conclusion] The concordance rate of multi-gene testing to single-gene testing tended to be poor for some genes. The prognosis for Driver+ patients without targeted therapy was not different from that for Driver- patients and could be improved with appropriately performed biomarker testing and the initiation of targeted therapies.

ODxTT was able to detect driver mutations in 58.5% of cases. However, there were some cases where the results of the ODxTT and EGFR clamp assays diverged for detecting EGFR mutations. The reasons for unsuccessful ODxTT testing could be problems with sample quantity or nucleic acid quality or the sequencing analysis program failed to detect rare variants.

This study investigated the distribution of EGFR E20ins in the Asian population, with p.A767_V769dup and p.S768_D770dup being the most frequently observed mutations. Since some studies have reported single EGFR E20ins sequences using different names, it is important to be cautious when describing EGFR E20ins. To ensure comprehensive coverage in real-world settings, each method used for the detection of EGFR E20ins must be annotated according to the HGVS nomenclature.

False positives for exon 20 insertion may occur when using cobas EGFR, and false negatives for exon 19 deletion and L858R mutations may occur when using ODxTT.

DNA concentration and degree of RNA degradation are key factors determining the success of diagnostic testing by the ODxTT.

NERoNE evaluates data from NGS profiling of three OU mapping key actionable molecular alterations in a large population of aNSCLC also accounting for PDL1 status. This preliminary analysis will be the starting point for further evaluations in order to improve the personalized approach to aNSCLC. >*For 15 pts PDL1 expression was not known.

This study demonstrates the analytical and clinical accuracy of the ODxT Test as a CDx for detecting activating HER2 mutations in NSCLC to identify pts who may benefit from T-DXd. A high level of agreement was also shown between the ODxT Test and CTAs. Clinical trials for HER2m NSCLC may successfully use a central testing assay as a CDx while allowing adequately validated local testing assays to expedite patient enrollment.

No abstracts available

TTT was decreased from 29 to 22 days with ODxTT, in contrast with single biomarker tests (median, 21-23 days overall). These results indicate that biomarker testing frequency has changed in Japanese clinical practice during the study and that the use of ODxTT has increased over time, which potentially contributed to the shortening of TTT.

The success rate of ODTT testing improved after the introduction of ROSE and the implementation of the test at their facility.

The Results of implementation rate of biomarker testing, and analysis Results of factors related to the success rate of biomarker testing will be reported at this meeting. We hope that the Results of this study would contribute to the establishment of a system where all patients with lung cancer can receive appropriate personalized medicine.

We are currently collecting information on treatment and prognosis, and the rate of induction of systemic therapy and the proportion of patients receiving each targeted therapy drug based on each biomarker will be reported at this meeting. We hope that the results of this study would contribute to the establishment of a system where all patients with lung cancer can receive appropriate personalized medicine.

The success rate of ODxTT is slightly inferior to that of cobas EGFR. ODxTT shared a high concordance rate and k-coefficient with cobas EGFR in detecting EGFR mutations, but discordant results between the two tests were observed in a few cases, mainly due to the difference of detectable EGFR variants.