NON MYELOABLATIVE VERSUS REDUCED INTENSITY CONDITIONING FOR ALLO-HCT FROM SIBLING OR UNRELATED DONORS IN PATIENTS WITH AML ≥65YEARS. A STUDY FROM THE EBMT ALWP (EBMT 2023)
Retrospective analysis of transplant outcomes for AML patients ≥65 years old (n=2900) who had first allo-HCT in first or second complete remission (CR1/CR2) between years 2004-2021 from either matched sibling, HLA-10/10 or HLA-9/10 matched unrelated, or haploidentical unrelated donor receiving RIC Fludarabine/Busulfan iv 6.4mg/kg (Flu/Bu2) (35.6%, n=1033), or Fludarabine/Melphalan 110-140mg/m2(Flu/Mel) (22.2%, n=643), or Fludarabine/Treosulfan 30g/m2(Flu/Treo) (10.8%, n=313), versus NMA Fludarabine/Total Body Irradiation 2Gy (Flu/TBI2Gy) (31.4%, n=911)...The RIC arm had more Karnofsky score ≥90 (70% vs 63.4%, p<0.0006), female donor to male recipient combination (44.7% vs 16.6%, p<0.0001), and in vivo T cell depletion (82.5% vs 10.2%, p,0.0001) whereas NMA patients more frequently received a haploidentical graft (19.9% vs 4.3%, p<0.0001), bone marrow graft (6.4% vs 3.1%, p<0.0001), and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (23.8% vs 7.3%, p<0.0001)... We conclude that conditioning intensity (NMA vs RIC) did not impact on 2-year NRM, LFS and OS in elderly (≥65 years) AML. Higher risk of acute gr II-IV GVHD and lower risk of extensive chronic GVHD using RIC compared to NMA was identified. Subgroup sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant interaction between conditioning intensity and pre-transplant MRD status in terms of transplant outcomes.