To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing zuberitamab combined with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; Hi-CHOP) versus rituximab combined with CHOP (R-CHOP) as first-line therapy for previously untreated CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients in China. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) demonstrated R-CHOP's superior cost-effectiveness probability relative to Hi-CHOP across a WTP range from $0 to $150,000. Given that Hi-CHOP is not cost-effective at conventional WTP thresholds, a substantial price reduction or unnecessary procedures, and optimizing clinical workflows for Hi-CHOP would be necessary to make it an economically viable first-line option for DLBCL compared to R-CHOP.
P=N/A, N=48, Not yet recruiting, Taizhou Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University); Taizhou Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University)