AZD9496

Pharmacological blockade or siRNA silencing of ERα limited cell survival and metastasis while restoring tight junction protein expression. In conclusion, these findings highlight the potential of ERα as a prognostic marker for CRC and its role in metastasis.

The significant advantage of this method is that the mathematical model does not have to contain a small parameter (as is standard in perturbation theory). However, it is possible to artificially introduce a small parameter into the system of equations, making it possible to study the model using asymptotic methods.

Mechanically, the AZD9496 and fulvestrant significantly blocked JAK2/STAT5B pathway in GT1-1 cells and xenograft mice. Our results provide substantial evidence for the subsequent clinical use of AZD9496 in the treatment of patients with pituitary adenoma.

This study revealed that PBX1 participated in estrogen mediated BCa progression and chemo-resistance through binding and activating estrogen receptors. Hence, PBX1 may serve as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target for BCa treatment.

Whole blood (WB) specimens were collected at serial time points from patients with advanced ER-POS/HER2-negative (NEG) advanced breast cancer in a phase I trial of AZD9496, an oral selective ER degrader (SERD) ET...Intra-patient, inter-CTC genomic heterogeneity was observed, at times between timepoints, in subclonal alterations. Our analysis suggests that serial monitoring of the CTC genome is feasible and should enable real-time tracking of tumor evolution during progression, permitting more combination precision medicine interventions.

Fulvestrant (SERD, #S1191), AZD9496 (novel, orally bioavailable SERD, #S8372) and ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor, #S7440) were obtained from Selleckchem. Using publicly available data, our results highlight the positive impact ET has on HER2+ breast cancer survival outcome. In vitro data supports the combination of novel SERDs and neratinib as a therapeutic strategy that warrants further investigation in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer.

SAR studies revealed that while the acrylic acid moiety of AZD9496 is scaffold hopping into benzoic acid, compound D24 exhibits potent binding affinity with ERα, good degradation efficacy of ERα, and inhibitory effect against the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Besides, D24 also displays good antitumor efficacy in the MCF-7 human breast cancer xenograft model in vivo, favorable pharmacokinetic properties, excellent druggability, and good safety property, making D24 as a promising drug candidate of SERD for further evaluation.

Serial monitoring of CTC and ctDNA genomic alterations is feasible and should enable real-time tracking of response/progression, tumor evolution and opportunities for precision medicine interventions.

Furthermore, AZD9496 exhibited partial agonist activity in growth assays in ILC cell lines. Our study provides evidence for a distinct ERα regulation by SERDs in ILC cell lines and therefore it is important to include ILC models into preclinical and clinical testing of novel SERDs.

AZD9496 was also compared to fulvestrant in vitro as a single agent or in combination with anastrozole. These results suggest that AZD9496 may be a better alternative to fulvestrant due to its selectivity for mammary ER and ability to inhibit aromatase in addition of downregulating ERα that can be obtained upon oral administration. As such, AZD9496 may prove to be a better option than fulvestrant for the treatment of hormone sensitive human breast cancer.

The selective ER degrader (SERD) fulvestrant has demonstrated clinical benefit over aromatase inhibitors and the selective ER modulator tamoxifen. AZD9496, on the other hand, demonstrated inferior ERα degradation in several ER+ breast cancer cell lines and partial agonism. This may explain the result of the clinical window of opportunity study, comparing AZD9496 to fulvestrant, in which AZD9496 failed to demonstrate superior degradation of ERα, downregulation of PR expression and reduction in Ki67 positivity.

This was the first pre‑surgical study to demonstrate that an oral SERD impacts its key biological targets. However, AZD9496 was not superior to fulvestrant at the dose tested.

However, it is not clear which, if any, model accurately reflects the clinical setting and how AZD9496 would compare to fulvestrant at exposures achievable in the clinic. Thus, testing AZD9496 vs fulvestrant in ER+ breast cancer patients is crucial to determine potential clinical benefit.

AZD9496 250 mg BID reduced ER, PR and Ki-67 expression, and as such, is the first pre surgical study to demonstrate an oral SERD impacting its key biological targets. These reductions were not superior to the FULV clinically approved dose, which performed as expected based on historical data. Pre-surgical studies represent an important method to test the proof of mechanism of novel SERDs early in clinical development.

However, the full clinical potential of fulvestrant is believed to be limited by poor bioavailability, spurring attempts to generate ligands capable of driving ER degradation but with improved drug-like properties.Here, we evaluate three ER ligand clinical candidates that recently emerged from prospective optimization of ER degradation – GDC-0810, AZD9496 and GDC-0927 - and show that they display distinct mechanistic features. This class of “always mobile” ER variants promotes an antagonist-to-agonist transcriptional switch for fulvestrant and GDC-0927, and simultaneously prevents ER degradation by these molecules, implying that ER immobilization is a key functional determinant of robust transcriptional suppression.We thus propose that ER degradation is not a driver of full ER antagonism, but rather a downstream consequence of ER immobilization, occurring after a suppressive phenotype has been established at chromatin. We additionally argue that evaluating the transcriptional output of candidate ER therapeutics, both pre-clinically and clinically, will be critical for the identification of ER ligands with best-in-class potential.