PRAME expression

Exposure to GSK343 or ATRA results in inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of cellular senescence, where GSK343 shows a dominant effect. The Figure was created with Biorender.com.

The PRAME has significance in discriminating the conjunctival malignant melanoma and pigmented nevus. It is a useful biomarker in the diagnosis of conjunctival malignant melanoma.

Then, the present results can suggest that elevated PRAME and Ki-67 expression are associated with poor overall survival in cutaneous melanoma; however, in multivariate analysis, only the Breslow thickness had a significant influence. These findings highlight the potential of PRAME and Ki-67 as prognostic markers, opening frontiers that could improve strategies for treating cutaneous melanoma.

PRAME expression confirmed the existence of a late-onset oncogenic nevoid pathway that can be defined by histopathology. Subsequent meta-analysis data linked to the meta-analytic framework revealed that PRAME is an epigenetic surrogate antigen expressed because of repression of retinoic acid receptor signaling, preventing ligand-induced retinoic acid cellular differentiation, growth arrest, and apoptosis, and promoting melanoma growth and survival for melanomas. PRAME is only a single antigen within a highly complex dynamic framework that governs nevoid oncogenesis. Significantly, the retinoic acid/retinoic acid receptor complex has been shown to modulate the immunosuppressive arm of regulatory T cells underpinning immune tolerance and is pertinent to the broad framework but is not linked to PRAME expression in this arm.

Double staining of CD34 and PRAME revealed that PRAME-positive and CD34-positive areas did not overlap. This is the largest study to examine PRAME expression in FS-DFSP, and it confirmed the usefulness of PRAME in diagnosing this condition.

In conclusion, PRAME staining helps distinguish thin melanomas from dysplastic nevi. However, the threshold of positivity should be lowered in order not to miss thin melanomas.

Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and PARP-2 in cells expressing PRAME could lead to potential therapeutic applications. Pathway enrichment analysis underscores the significance of PRAME and BAP1 in melanoma pathogenesis.

Although PRAME is expressed in normal sebaceous units, it appears less useful as diagnostic marker for PSC, especially in poorly differentiated tumors. In difficult cases, panels of IHC studies (adipophilin, Ber-EP4, and EMA) achieve a definitive diagnosis.

PRAME is a useful marker for the diagnosis of melanoma in cytology material, but it is less sensitive than SOX10. PRAME is also expressed in other nonmelanocytic tumors which limits its specificity.

However, histone acetylation may be one of the epigenetic mechanisms involved in PRAME regulation. Thus, the therapeutic combination of histone deacetylase inhibitors and PRAME immunotherapy merits further investigation.

Lesions not associated with DICER1 pathogenic variants also showed ER-positive stromal cells, including cystic pulmonary airway malformations, cystic renal dysplasia, and simple renal cysts in adult kidneys. ER expression in stromal cells is not a feature of DICER1 perturbation but rather is related to the presence of cystic components.

As the available data primarily stem from adult melanoma, and given the clinical and histological distinctions in pediatric melanomas, our understanding of PRAME expression in this specific patient group remains limited. The age-dependent low PRAME expression shown here constrains the use of this marker in pediatric melanoma and may also limit the use of immunotherapeutic strategies against PRAME in young patients.

In contrast, AR was moderately sensitive (66%) and highly specific (92%) for the distinction of SC from basaloid mimics. These attributes, in addition to the nuclear expression of AR in the sebocytic and basaloid components of SC, suggest that AR is superior to PRAME for the diagnosis of SC.

Preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) expression has been characterized as a relatively specific marker of melanoma, but not within the specific population of special-site lesions. This study aimed to determine if PRAME may serve as a specific marker of melanoma within the population of special-sites lesions.

No abstract available

Emerging immunotherapies, including T-cell-based therapies and vaccines targeting PRAME, are being investigated to exploit its cancer-specific expression. Ongoing research into the molecular role and mechanism of action of PRAME in skin cancer continues to open new avenues in both diagnostics and therapeutics, with the potential to transform the management of melanoma and related skin cancers.

Pathologists should carefully consider that a PRAME-positive cellular population within the context of a nevus could indicate a CM associated with the nevus. A negative result does not rule out this possibility.

Our study showed that HER2 positive and TN breast carcinomas more commonly express PRAME than ER positive carcinomas and that PRAME expression shows positive correlation with certain prognostic factors, however PRAME wasn't revealed as an independent prognostic factor in our study. The importance of PRAME expression in breast carcinoma lies in its potential use as an immunotherapeutic target, particularly in patients with limited therapeutic options.

P1/2, N=8, Completed, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Suspended --> Completed

We confirm that PRAME is associated with poor prognosis in UM and has a strong connection with extra copies of 8q. We show that PRAME-specific immunotherapy in an adjuvant setting is promising in treatment of malignancies, including UM.

Of 214 screened patients, 14 were treated (6, IMA101; 8, IMA101 and atezolizumab). Target-specific T cells expanded to constitute up to 78.7% of CD8+ cells. In conclusion, IMA101 was feasible and well tolerated, leveraging the potential of multi-targeted ACT that warrants further investigation.

Therefore, PRAME expression may serve as a useful marker for CIS of the urinary tract. Furthermore, PRAME may be a candidate for the novel therapeutic target for standard treatment-refractory CIS patients.

Furthermore, a trend of increased PRAME expression from LG-DN to HG-DN was observed. However, the applicability of PRAME in the differential diagnosis of dysplastic lesions remains unclear as can yield conflicting results with morphology, which remains the primary diagnostic tool for melanocytic lesions.

Our results further support PRAME overexpression in gynecologic cancers, including CS with similar expression levels in epithelial and mesenchymal components. PRAME might have a role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in this group of cancers.

PRAME expression renders cells susceptible to inhibition of PARP1/2, suggesting increased dependence on alternative base excision repair pathways. These findings reveal a distinct oncogenic function of PRAME that can be targeted therapeutically in cancer.

Our results confirm the superiority of PRAME over HMB-45 in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors. However, combined staining can significantly increase specificity, rendering a benign diagnosis more unlikely in a double 4+ diffuse positivity setting.

PRAME nuclear positivity in melanoma cells was associated with epithelioid cell dominant (>90%) UM histological subtype, higher mitotic numbers and a higher percentage of chromosome 8q gain. This study proposes VISTA as a novel relevant immune checkpoint molecule in primary UM and contributes to confirm LAG-3 and PRAME as potentially important immunotherapy targets in the treatment of UM patients, helping to expand the number of immunotherapy candidate molecules that are relevant to modulate in this aggressive cancer.

Our study demonstrates that Melan-A expression can be strong and diffuse in a subset of otherwise unequivocal cutaneous GCTs, which may cause diagnostic confusion with malignant melanoma. HMB45 and PRAME did not stain any of the GCTs in our series.

Our data emphasize the diagnostic utility of PRAME staining as a first screening tool in the detection and workup of dedifferentiated and undifferentiated melanomas, both in the primary and metastatic settings. PRAME immunohistochemistry is particularly helpful as it is also positive in tumors without a recognizable conventional melanoma precursor and in those associated with desmoplastic melanomas, where PRAME is typically found to be negative.

Here, we show statistical analyses on PRAME expression for melanoma with Breslow > 1 mm based on survival rate and long-term follow-up. According to our results, PRAME is a useful immunohistochemical ancillary tool in daily practice diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

The clinico-pathologic correlations and survival analysis showed no prognostic significance.The results of our study showed that PRAME is neither prognostic nor a suitable ancillary marker in the differential diagnosis of tubo-ovarian epithelial tumors. Nevertheless, knowledge about the PRAME expression may be important concerning its potential predictive significance, because targeting PRAME as a potential therapeutic option is currently under investigation.

MAGE-A4, NY-ESO-1, PRAME and KK-LC-1 are overexpressed in breast cancer, especially in TNBC. Positive expression of MAGE-A4 or PARME may be associated with prolonged DFS. A panel of CTAs is attractive universal targets for immunotherapy.

Most metastatic melanomas are positive for PRAME, whereas nodal nevi are not. Numerous studies on PRAME IHC have become available in the past few years with results supporting the value of PRAME IHC as an ancillary tool in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions and providing insights into limitations in sensitivity and specificity as well as possible pitfalls that need to be kept in mind by practicing pathologists.

PRAME expression statuses may dictate different biological and clinicopathological profiles in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

P1/2, N=4, Terminated, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals | N=28 --> 4 | Unknown status --> Terminated; company decision

In sinonasal MM, PRAME IHC staining in ≥70% of cells is associated with significantly lower survival probability. Male sex, pN1 stage, and tumor location in the sinus are also predictive of poorer survival outcomes. These findings highlight the potential prognostic significance of PRAME expression and other clinicopathological factors in MM. Further studies are warranted to validate and expand upon these observations.

Conclusions The results of this preclinical study clearly highlighted the potential of simultaneously targeting PRAME and PD-L1 by fusion protein vaccination in cancer immunotherapy. Both fusion protein vaccines are currently being evaluated in an aggressive B16/F10 melanoma model.

Importantly, HLA-A/B/C alleles were almost always lost together, indicating that HLA loss most frequently occurs through haplotype loss, informing a strategy to direct multiplexed TCR-T to the remaining HLA haplotype. Conclusions Overall, these data highlight the importance of a multiplexed TCR-T cell therapy targeting various intact tumor antigens presented on intact HLA alleles in order to effectively address solid tumors.

In comparison to melanomas, the rarity of this particular fusion in melanocytomas may suggest the possibility of rapid malignant transformation, and patients diagnosed with this entity should be monitored closely. Poster type: Poster Defense

Even focal expression of a melanocytic marker should cast doubt on a diagnosis of PDS and raise the possibility of de-differentiated melanoma, since therapy and outcomes are significantly different. Poster type: Poster Defense