LRP1B mutation

This study utilizes targeted NGS to uncover the relationship between LRP1B mutation and LNM status, contributing to the development of primary prevention and proactive treatment strategies.

Our results confirmed that LRP1B affected the efficacy of immunotherapy by modulating the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to ferroptosis. LRP1B mutations represent a highly promising immunotherapeutic biomarker for NSCLC.

The presence of LRP1B mutation was significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS), whereas RB1 mutation and advanced TNM stage were associated with shorter OS. We identified frequently mutated genes and potential predictors of survival in patients with gastric NECs and MANECs.

In the POPLAR/OAK cohort, nsqNSCLCs with LRP1B-del demonstrated improved PFS benefits from atezolizumab over docetaxel (hazard ratio (HR) =0.70, P=0.046), whereas this benefit was negligible in those without LRP1B-del (HR=1.05, P=0.64)...Consistent results were observed in the in-house CHOICE-01 cohort, in which nsqNSCLCs with LRP1B-del and sqNSCLCs without LRP1B-del benefited more from toripalimab plus chemotherapy than from chemotherapy alone (Pinteraction=0.008). This multi-cohort study delineates the antithetical impacts of LRP1B-del in nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs on predicting the benefits from ICI alone or with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Our findings highlight the distinct clinical utility of LRP1B-del in guiding treatment choices for nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed analysis based on pathological subtypes when investigating biomarkers for cancer therapeutics.

Our analysis identified distinct mutational characteristics in ITAC and non-ITAC. Mutational signature analysis may eventually become useful for documentation of occupation-related cancer, while the exact mechanisms behind wood dust-driven carcinogenesis remain elusive. The presence of homologous recombination deficiency signatures implies a novel opportunity for treatment, but further studies are needed.

In endometrial cancer, co-mutation of FAT3 and LRP1B not only leads to activation of the immune state, but also represents a subgroup with an improved prognosis, particularly in the MSI-H subtype.

Participants received 3 cycles of induction oxaliplatin and capecitabine combined with camrelizumab and radiotherapy (50.6 Gy in 22 fractions) with concurrent capecitabine. Longer follow-up and larger clinical studies are needed to validate this innovative regimen. There is also an urgent need to further validate the predictive value of LRP1B and discover other novel biomarkers with potential predictive value for rectal cancer.

Mutations in EGFR and LRP1B could potentially establish an immune niche that fosters tumor growth. PAMs in LUAD may accelerate disease progression by promoting T cell differentiation into an exhausted state.

LRP1B has a high prognostic value in GC. LRP1B may stimulate tumor immune cell infiltration to provide GC patients with survival benefits.

Large positive fluxes of KRAS variants were driven by large selection coefficients, whereas the flux toward LRP1B mutations was substantially aided by a large mutation rate for this gene. The approach enables inference of the most likely routes of site-specific variant evolution and estimation of the strength of selection operating on each step along the route, a key component of what we need to know to develop and implement personalized cancer therapies.

We observed enrichment of genetic aberrations of DNA damage response pathway (TP53 and CDKN2A/B), and a significant increase in MCL heterogeneity. We identified LRP1B inactivation as a new potential driver of MCL relapse.

LRP1B could directly bind to NCSTN and affect its protein expression level, thereby regulating the PI3K/AKT pathway. Our mutational analysis revealed complex and orchestrated liposomal alterations linked to doxorubicin resistance that may also render cancers less susceptible to immunotherapy and also provides new treatment alternatives.

SMARCA4-dNSCLC has unique clinicopathological features and a shorter survival prognosis than SMARCA4-iNSCLC. The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy needs to be observed for longer periods.

Our findings suggested that MAD is a practical and simple algorithm for assessing ITH, and populations with high MAD values are more likely to have EGFR mutations. MAD can be used as a potential biomarker to predict not only the prognosis of NSCLC but also the efficacy of immunotherapy and TKI therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series to date to compare the efficacy of ICI-based treatment to chemotherapy and document frequent mutations of LRP1B in SD-UT. ICI plus chemotherapy is an effective strategy for Stage IV SD-UT.

Finally, LRP1B-mutated LUAD patients showed a significant prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) in the ICIs cohort and could be effectively predicted by our constructed nomogram. Our study suggests that LRP1B mutation is associated with higher immune cell infiltration and elevated immune gene expression in TIME and potentially serves as a prognostic biomarker for LUAD patients treated with ICIs.

WES revealed significantly mutated genes associated with the molecular mechanisms of PCNSL, which could serve as therapeutic targets to improve patient outcomes.

PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition, PI3Kalpha inhibitor, AKT inhibitor, FGFR inhibitor, ALK/IGF1R inhibitor, CDK4/6 inhibitor, BCl2 inhibitor, WEE1 inhibitor, ATR inhibitor, DNA-PK inhibitor, AT2AR inhibitor, Mcl-1 inhibitor, MEK1/2 inhibitor, EZH2 inhibitor, HDAC inhibitor, CDK9 inhibitor, DNMT3 inhibitor, BRD4/BET inhibitor, JAK2 inhibitor, CXCR4 inhibitor, FAK inhibitor, BTK inhibitor, eribulin, & VEGFR2/ PDGFR/FGFR or VEGFR2/c-MET/Axl triple blockage might be effective on TW2.6 and reverse treatment refractoriness, maybe through the inhibition of mesenchymal transformation, pRB, & PI3K/AKT /mTOR signaling and the modulation of stemness & PD1/PDL1 pathway...All cell lines will be tried to be categorized as TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations.Cell linesSCC25KBSASCAL27FaDuSCC15SCC9SCC4TW2.6Differ- entiationWellPoorPoorPoorPoorWellWellWellWell, but rapidly replicated, with high hyper-diploidy & complex rearrangementsHPV statusHPV 16/18HPV18--HPV 16/18--HPV 6/11-EGFR statusMediumLowHighHighMediumHighLowMedium to highUnknownDocetaxel sensitivity+++++++++++++ to +++++-+Cisplatin sensitivity+++++++++++++- to +-- to +5-FU sensitivity+++++++++++-+ to ++-- to +Afatinib sensitivity+++- to +-+++++ to +++++++++-Polo-like kinase Inhibitor sensitivity+++++++++++++ to +++- to +-- to +VEGFR2 Inhibitor sensitivity----+++++--++PI3K/ mTOR inhibitorAll cell lines sensitiveCDK4/6 Inhibitor response+++- to ++++++ to +++++++++++++ to +++Western blotsWeak p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 and BMI-1, Gli-1(+)Weak p-AKT, mild PDL1 and strong VEGF-A & BMI-1, p16(+)Moderate p-AKT & BMI-1, high PDL1, mild VEGF-AHigh p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 & BMI-1High VEGF-A, moderate p-AKT & PDL1, weak BMI-1, Gli-1(+)Weak p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 & BMI-1Weak p-AKT, VEGF-A, & BMI-1, moderate PDL1Moderate p-AKT & VEGF-A, strong BMI-1, mild PDL1, Gli-1(+)High p-AKT, PDL1, & VEGF-A and moderate BMI-1NGSCCND1 gain, CDKN2A deletion, FRG1 mutation, HGF mutation, p53 mutation, ATR mutation, SMO mutation, RUNX1T1 mutationSTK11 mutation, PDGFRA mutation, IGF1 mutation, BCOR mutation, EGFR mutation, NOTCH1 mutation, MET mutation, IKZF1 mutation, NFKB1 mutation, DPYD mutation, FGFR4 mutation, BRCA1 mutation, MSH2 mutation, DNMT3A mutationKRAS mutation, MDM2 mutation, TMB-H, AXIN1 loss, RAD51D mutation, NOTCH1/2 mutation, ERBB4 mutation, PALB2 mutation, p53 mutation, POLE mutation, CASP8 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, RNF43 mutation, LRP1B mutation, MET mutationCDKN2A deletion, EGFR amplification, SMAD4 mutation, TMB-H, LRP1B mutation, APC mutation, CASP8 mutation, CREBBP mutation, PIK3CG mutation, NRAS mutation, ABL1 mutation, FGF23 mutation, HGF mutation, ATRX mutation, p53 mutation, ERBB2 mutation, ROS1 mutation, EP300 mutation, NRAS mutation, CDKN1A mutation, KDM6A mutation, FLT4 mutationCCND1 gain, CDKN2A deletion, FLCN mutation, TMB-H, LRP1B mutation, SMAD4 loss, SF3B1 mutation, FAT1 mutation, VHL mutation, NOTCH3 mutation, EPHA5 mutation, p53 mutation, ERCC2 mutationCCND1 gain, EGFR amplification, SMO mutation, ATR mutation, FAT1 loss, NTRK1 mutation, KMT2D mutation, p53 mutation, NOTCH3 mutationCDKN2A deletion, AXIN2 amplification, SMAD3 loss, HRAS mutation, ATR mutation, NF1 mutation. IGF1R mutation, FLCN mutation, KEAP1 mutation, ASXL1 mutation, PMS2 mutationCCND1 gain, NF1 loss, LRP1B mutation, NSD1 mutation, KMT2D mutation, p53 mutation, EPHA2 mutationFAT1 loss, CCND3/FGF10 amplification, PIK3CA H1047R mutation, STK11 mutation, RICTOR/FLCN amplification, VEGF-A amplification , TSC2 mutation, EPHB1 mutation, MAP2K4 mutation, KDM5A mutation, PDGFRB mutation, SETD2 mutation, RPTOR mutation, APC mutation, DDR2 mutation, ATM mutation, MDM2 mutation, p53 mutation, CDK12 mutation, HRAS mutation, MYC mutation, CDK8 mutation, ARID1B lossOutcomesBest; like TCGA CL (HPV+) subtypeLike TCGA basal subtype, but responded to particular treatments eachBasalBasalLike TCGA mesen-chymal subtype (HPV+)Like TCGA CL(HPV-) subtype, different characters between these 3 cell linesCL(HPV-) subtypeCL(HPV-) subtypeWorse; like TCGA EMT subtype (HPV-)Potential treatmentsAll sensitive maybe; Hedgehog inhibitor , HGF/c-MET inhibitor, and I/O could be tried(1) Taxane, cisplatin, PLKi (2) mTORi (3) IGF1Ri, METi, PDGFRi, FGFRi (4) Epigenetics (5) I/O(1) Taxane, cisplatin, 5-FU, PLKi (2) CDK4/6i (3) I/O (4) DDRi (5) KRASi, METi, HERi (6) p53 reactivator and MDM2/Mcl-1 inhibitor(1) Taxane, cisplatin, 5-FU, PLKi (2) CDK4/6i (3) Mild EGFRi response (4) I/O (5) NRASi, FGFRi, HGF/c-METi/ROS1i/HERi (6) p53 reactivator/DDRi/Epigenetics(1) Cisplatin, 5-FU (2) EGFRi and VEGFR2i (3) Weak to PLKi & CDK4/6i (4) I/O (5) mTORi (6) Ephi (7) DDR/Epigenetics (8) p53 reactivator (9) HIFi(1) Taxane and PLKi (2) EGFRi, VEGFR2i, CDK4/6i (3) NTRKi (4) Hedgehog inhibitor (5) DDRi, epigenetics,& p53 reactivator(1) Taxane &5-FU (2) EGFRi (3) HRASi (4) DDRi/Epigenetics (5) I/O (6) IGF1Ri (7) mTORi(1) EGFRi (2) CDK4/6i (3) I/O (4) Epigenetics (5) Ephi (6) p53 reactivator(1) CDK4/6 inhibitor (2) Multi-targeted VEGFR TKI (3) PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor (4) ICIs combination (5) p53 reactivator/ DDR interventions/Epigenetics (6) Dasatinib, HRASi, EphB1/B4 interventions Further NGS analysis may translate these HNSCC cell lines to represent TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations, esp... Further NGS analysis may translate these HNSCC cell lines to represent TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations, esp. immunotherapy, basic/translational research, and animal models. LRP1B will be a potential ICIs efficacy biomarker in HNSCC.

Males and females with non-hypermutated CRC had different trends in EP300 mutations by age group. These findings define genomic patterns of early-onset non-hypermutated CRC by race/ethnicity and sex, which yields novel biological clues into early-onset CRC disparities.

We found significant transcriptome changes in the enrichment of metabolic-related pathways and immunological characteristics between the two groups, suggesting the predictability of HCC immunotherapy by using this model. Through the CMap database, we found that AM580 had potential therapeutic significance for high-risk TP53 wild-type HCC patients.

Our case represents the first report of an infant with an MN1 astroblastoma with APC and LRP1B gene alterations in the cervical spine. Gross total resection paired with a detailed histopathologic analysis is vital for optimizing adjuvant treatment.

The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) of oligometastasis was 5.00 mutations/Mb, which was significantly associated with smoking, DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, TP53 mutation, SMARCA4 mutation, LRP1B mutation, ABL1 mutation. Our results shall help redefine oligometastasis beyond simple lesion enumeration that will ultimately improve the selection of patients with real oligometastatic state and optimize personalized cancer therapy for oligometastatic NSCLC.

Patients with detectable ctDNA mutations trended to present advanced Ann Arbor stages (III-IV), elevated LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) levels, shorter OS and PFS, and a lower complete response (CR) rate to the R-CHOP regimen compared with DLBCL patients without ctDNA mutations. In addition, mean VAF (≥4.94%) and PCLO mutations were associated with poor OS and PFS. We investigated the ctDNA mutation landscape in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and found that ctDNA could reflect tumor burden and patients with detectable ctDNA mutations trended to have shorter OS and PFS and a lower CR rate.

We report a patient with HCC refractory to several lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, who was treated with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) as the fourth line. Our case demonstrates that immunotherapy can be efficient in a late-line scenario, resulting in long-term survival. Further studies should prospectively evaluate the value of SETD2 and LRP1B alterations as predictors for the success of immunotherapy in HCC.

Cervical SCC and AC have different molecular profiles and immune characteristics, suggesting that targeted treatments for SCC and AC patients may improve clinical outcomes. KMT2C and LRP1B gene mutations are independent predictors of TMB-high status in cervical cancer. We also proposed the prognostic value of PTEN mutations.

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that cell cycle, the Notch signaling pathway, the insulin signaling pathway, and the mTOR signaling pathway are related to LRP1B mutations in the immune system. LRP1B mutations may be of clinical importance in enhancing the anti-tumor immune response and may be a promising biomarker for predicting immunotherapy responsiveness.

GI-NECs harbor distinct genomic landscapes and demonstrate significant genetic heterogeneity across different anatomic locations. Moreover, potentially actionable alterations and prognostic factors were revealed for GI-NECs.

Our study provides a comprehensive view of the exonic mutation profile of the largest pGI-DLBCL cohort to date. The results could facilitate the clinical development of novel therapeutic and prognostic biomarkers for pGI-DLBCL.

APC, one of the most frequently mutated genes in gastrointestinal tumors, was further investigated, and the potential interventions by cochinchinone B and rottlerin were clarified. In summary, based on the analysis of the characteristics of gene mutations in the "real world," we obtained the potential association indicators of TMB, found the key signatures LRP1B and APC, and further described their biological significance and potential interventions.

Our study is the first to report comprehensive genomic features and mutational signatures in Chinese ASC patients. Results obtained from our study will help the scientific community better understand signature-related mutational processes in ASC.

There is a difference in immune microenvironment and gene expression profiles between pCR and non pCR patients. And the expression levels of CD8 + cells in tumour stroma, PD-L1+ cells in tumour parenchyma and tumour stroma are high, and LRP1B gene is prone to mutationin pCR patients. The nom-ogram of predicting pCR rate has good consistency, which can provide a certain predictive value for breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant therapy

The present study is the first to report that increased bITH is associated with unfavorable outcomes of ICIs plus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

These findings revealed immunophenotypic attenuation in recurrent tumors and provided valuable information for improving the management of these high-risk patients. Due to the small number of patients in this study, these differences need to be further validated in a larger cohort.

Further research identified six GC-related driver genes associated with the levels of immune infiltration of different immune cells and the majority of immune markers. Our mutation-based study of driver oncogenes identified potential drug targets in GC.

This work provides evidence that co-occurring mutations of LRP1B and FAT in NSCLC may serve as a group of potential predictive factors in guiding immunotherapy on the basis of their association with TMB status.

Collectively, our results revealed that LRP1B mutation was related to high TMB value and poor prognosis in LIHC, indicating that LRP1B mutation is probably helpful for the selection of immunotherapy and prognosis prediction in LIHC.

The present study is the first to report that the increase of bITH is associated with unfavorable outcomes of ICIs plus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

The present study is the first to report that the increase of bITH is associated with unfavorable outcomes of ICIs plus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

We identified HCC subtypes from the perspective of metabolism-related pathway activity and proposed a robust prognostic signature for HCC.

Ibrutinib, as a single agent, has demonstrated limited activity in DLBCL with mutant MYD88 and wildtype CD79 . In this study, we identified 3 patients with mutant MYD88 and wildtype CD79A/B (8.1%), among whom 2 harbored MYD88 L265P variants and 1 had MYD88 S219C mutation. Conclusion The utility of mutational profiling may facilitate the identification of potential drug targets, which in turns may represent new therapeutic possibilities.

This study is the first to report that a single gene LRP1B mutation is associated with a poor clinical response to ICI treatment and negative outcomes in HCC patients. HighLRP1B expression correlated with tumor immunity and HCC prognosis.