LY3866288

P1, N=16, Not yet recruiting, Eli Lilly and Company

P1, N=30, Not yet recruiting, Eli Lilly and Company

Various agents, including pan-FGFR inhibitors (erdafitinib and futibatinib), FGFR1/2/3 inhibitors (infigratinib and pemigatinib), as well as a range of more-specific agents, have been developed and several have entered clinical use. The next generation of small-molecule inhibitors, such as lirafugratinib and LOXO-435, and the FGFR2-specific antibody bemarituzumab are expected to have a reduced risk of hyperphosphataemia and the ability to overcome certain resistance mutations. In this Review, we describe the development and current clinical role of FGFR inhibitors and provide perspective on future research directions including expansion of the therapeutic indications for use of FGFR inhibitors, combination of these agents with immune-checkpoint inhibitors and the application of novel technologies, such as artificial intelligence.

Background: Interest in FGFR-targeted (FGFRi) therapies for UC or pan-tumor use is growing (ongoing clinical studies include erdafitinib (NCT05316155; NCT04172675; NCT03390504; NCT04083976), LOXO-435 (NCT05614739), and pemigatinib (NCT03914794) following accelerated approval of erdafitinib in locally advanced/metastatic (m) post-chemotherapy UC patients with FGFR2/3 (i.e., DNA mutations and fusions) alterations (ALT). FGFR-PRS (+) captured most ALT (+) tumors and an additional 2X more with similar FGFR pathway activation. FGFR-PRS (+) tumors were associated with gene enrichments for ontologies linked to FGFR3 signaling. The correlation of FGFR-PRS score with in vitro FGFRi activity provided initial utility of the signature, which is undergoing clinical evaluation in the ALAMANCE retrospective study of UC patients treated with FGFRi or other standard-of-care therapies.

Cohort B will enroll pts with mUC and include 2 cohorts to evaluate LOXO-435 as monotherapy (B1, B2) and 1 cohort to evaluate LOXO-435 in combination with pembrolizumab (B3). Pts in cohort B1 must have progressed on or were intolerant to a prior FGFR inhibitor, and pts in cohorts B2, B3, and C1 must be FGFR inhibitor treatment naive. Dose expansion will evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antitumor activity (per RECIST v1.1) of LOXO-435 at the RP2D.