The prognostic impact of the KRAS G12C-mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a real-world analysis (AACR 2023)
Pts with KRAS G12C and WT had similar overall prognosis; however, those with KRAS G12C had worse rwPFS with CT + IO tx, as opposed to a trend in the opposite direction for pts treated with IO mono. KRAS G12C imposed worse prognosis vs WT in pts with STK11 or KEAP1 mutations.Table 1. OS and rwPFS in the overall population and subgroupsPSM-based comparisonaKRAS G12CKRAS WTOSN847b1318bMedian, months (95% Cl)11.8 (10.2-14.1)12.5 (11.6-14.0)HR (95% CI);p value1.05 (0.91-1.21);0.47rwPFSN846b,c1317b,cMedian, months (95% Cl)5.5 (4.9-6.2)5.6 (5.2-5.9)HR (95% CI);p value1.06 (0.94-1.20);0.33Multivariate Cox proportional hazard modelaMultivariate HRd (95% CI), KRAS G12Cvs KRAS WT; p valueOSAll pts (N=3526)1.05 (0.92-1.10);0.47KEAP1 mutation (n=506)1.64 (1.17-2.00);<0.01STK11 mutation (n=523)1.38 (1.02-1.86);0.04IO monotherapy in 1L (n=752)0.86 (0.64-1.15);0.32CT + IO in 1L (n=1218)1.15 (0.92-1.44);0.22rwPFSAll pts (N=3526)1.06 (0.94-1.20);0.35KEAP1 mutation (n=506)1.51 (1.11-2.05);<0.01STK11 mutation (n=523)1.25 (0.97-1.61);0.09IO monotherapy in 1L (n=752)0.91 (0.71-1.17);0.46CT + IO in 1L (n=1218)1.22 (1.01-1.49);0.04aRisk factors included in PSM and the multivariate Cox model: age, gender, race, ECOG performance status, smoking status, histology, stage at initial diagnosis, presence of brain metastases, PD-L1 expression category, and 1L treatment; bAll pts in KRAS G12C and WT populations in PSM (1 to up to 2 match); cAll patients with atleast 1 progression assessment; dMultivariate Cox model HR was based on complete case analyses, i.e., pts with non-missing data.CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PSM, propensity score matching.