The failure of single-target IDO1 inhibition, exemplified by the phase III setback of epacadostat, has highlighted the limitations imposed by compensatory TDO activity and the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment...Clinical-stage candidates have further demonstrated the translational potential of simultaneous IDO1/TDO blockade. Overall, this review offers new insights and strategic perspectives for therapeutic paradigms spanning cancer immunotherapy and neuropsychiatric intervention through modulation of the integrated immunity-metabolism-neurology axis.
Kyn pathway enzyme expression varies with disease progression and may indicate immune activity by influencing tumor microenvironment catabolites. BC cell sensitivity to immune stimuli differs, potentially shaping distinct immune escape mechanisms.
Notably, the dual inhibition of IDO1 and PARP1/2 specifically reduced the expression of HR core genes and proteins, such as BRCA1 and RAD51, which may contribute to impaired DNA-damage repair and increased sensitivity to Olaparib. In summary, targeting both IDO1 and PARP1/2 represents a promising combination therapy for BRCA-proficient TNBC.
By studying the turnover of IDO1 protein in human tumor cells exposed to various IDO1 catalytic inhibitors, such as epacadostat, linrodostat, and navoximod, we show here that these molecules stabilize a non-enzymatic protein conformation of IDO1, independently of their mechanism of inhibition. In the thyroid carcinoma cell line FTC-133, the stabilized and non-enzymatic IDO1 protein promotes the proliferation and migration of the tumor, resulting in an adverse pro-tumorigenic effect. These results uncover an unexpected adverse effect of IDO1 inhibitors in the tumor microenvironment that overcomes the enzymatic inhibition of IDO1, and suggest protein degradation, rather than enzymatic inhibition, as a more effective approach to target IDO1 in the tumor microenvironment.
These findings suggest a potential inhibitory mechanism for PF-06840003 and offer valuable structural insights for the rational design of potent IDO1 inhibitors. It should be noted that the inhibitory activity of the designed lead compounds is based solely on computational predictions; experimental validation through in vitro and in vivo studies is still required to confirm their actual inhibitory effects and pharmacokinetic properties.