FGFR wild-type

P2, N=55, Completed, TransThera Sciences (Nanjing), Inc. | Active, not recruiting --> Completed

Although FGFRalt did not predict outcomes in the overall cohort, for patients treated with 1L ICI, FGFRalt had significantly higher rates of progression than FGFRwt patients. Further validation is needed to determine whether FGFRalt has a decreased benefit from ICI therapy.

This last finding entails that also this setting of patients could benefit from FGFR targeted therapies, widening indication of these drugs for iCCA patients beyond current approval. Future clinical studies are therefore encouraged to confirm this hypothesis.

Tinengotinib has promising clinical benefit for FGFR2 fusion CCA after prior FGFRi and for non-fusion FGFR alterations. Tinengotinib-related toxicities were manageable. An ongoing randomized, controlled phase III study will evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamic effect of Tinengotinib vs Physicians’ choice in subjects with FGFR2-altered refractory/relapsed CCA after prior chemotherapy and FGFRi therapy.

P2, N=55, Active, not recruiting, TransThera Sciences (Nanjing), Inc. | Recruiting --> Active, not recruiting | N=80 --> 55 | Trial completion date: Sep 2023 --> May 2024 | Trial primary completion date: Sep 2023 --> May 2024

FGFR3 mutation can attenuate prognosis and response to ICB in patients with metastatic UC. FGFR3-mutated UC carries a stronger immunosuppressive microenvironment in comparison with FGFR3-wildtype UC. Inhibition of FGFR3 might activate the immune microenvironment, and the combination of FGFR inhibitor targeted therapy and ICB might be a promising therapeutic regimen in metastatic UC, providing important implications for UC clinical management.

For ex vivo drug testing, tumor clusters were isolated, seeded, and exposed to single-agent chemotherapy: carboplatin, cisplatin, gemcitabine and targeted therapy (erdafitinib). A correlation with clinical response to chemotherapy could not be established due to a lack of successfully screened patients with matching clinical chemotherapy treatment. For NMIBC, however, differential ex vivo sensitivity to gemcitabine, and a preliminary correlation for ex vivo erdafitinib sensitivity and FGFR3 mutation status offers a potential solution to select NMIBC patients for effective (novel) treatment options.

Conclusions In our cohort, FGFR3 alterations are neither predictive nor prognostic for 1st-line platinum or 2nd-line IO. Further investigation is needed.

Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in RW OS between pts with FGFR+ or FGFRadv/ met solid tumors, with a median OS of ∼1 year in both groups. These results highlight the poor prognosis and high unmet need for novel, targeted tx.

To our knowledge, we are the first to report these correlations in lung cancer. The results might be proof of the assumed activation of FAK-dependent signaling pathways by THSD7A and that as a membrane-associated protein, THSD7A might serve as a putative therapeutic target in LSCC.

FIPS effectively predicted survival in BLCA. Patients with different FIPS exhibited diverse immune infiltration and mFGFR3 status. FIPS might be a promising tool for selecting targeted therapy and immunotherapy for patients with BLCA.

This ongoing study suggests cfDNA is a valuable minimally invasive adjunct to tissue-based assays for the detection of FGFR alterations to identify patients for FGFR inhibitor therapy and to monitor for mechanisms of resistance.

Moreover, we observed that FGFR3 genomic alterations are mutually exclusive with other genomic aberrations of canonical bladder cancer oncogenes, such as TP53 and RB1. Finally, we provide an overview of the treatment landscape of FGFR3-altered bladder cancer, discussing future perspectives for the management of this disease.

Efficacy studies were conducted in HCC xenograft models and mutant FGFR4-dependent xenograft models including a RMS PDX model harboring FGFR4 V550L mutation. ABSK012 demonstrated strong potency over multiple FGFR4 mutants that are insensitive to a first generation FGFR4 inhibitor BLU-554. ABSK012, presented here by Abbisko Therapeutics, is a highly potent, selective, and next-generation small molecule FGFR4 inhibitor overcoming FGFR4 mutations resistant to first-generation inhibitors. Its superior preclinical profile supports its fast-track development into clinic.

Patient 1 harbored an FGFR2-USP33 fusion and exhibited a partial response to pemigatinib for 25 months following progression on gemcitabine/abraxane and FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Patient 2 harbored an FGFR2-INA fusion with 12 months of stable disease to pazopanib after experiencing progression from chemotherapy... This retrospective analysis provides clinical evidence that there is a subpopulation of KRAS wild-type FGFR2 fusion positive pancreatic patients who can have beneficial and lasting responses to FGFR inhibitors further suggesting a need to investigate and expand the availability of FGFR inhibitors to more cancer types.

Most importantly, efficacy in a mouse tumor xenograft model at a dose that does not show elevated plasma phosphorus levels in the rat hyperphosphatemia model will be presented. Herein, the in vitro and in vivo characterization of a representative selective reversible FGFR2 inhibitor is described.

Furthermore, it suppressed cellular FGFR signaling, exhibiting considerable antiproliferative activity in FGFR-aberrant cancer cell lines. In addition, the oral administration of 2e in the FGFR1-amplified H1581, FGFR2-amplified NCI-H716, and SNU-16 tumor xenograft models demonstrated potent antitumor efficacy, inducing tumor stasis or even tumor regression.

P2, N=80, Recruiting, TransThera Sciences (Nanjing), Inc. | Trial primary completion date: Dec 2022 --> Sep 2023

Furthermore, 10z showed significant antiproliferative activity against Hep3B, JHH-7, and HuH-7 HCC cells with IC values of 37, 32, and 94 nM, respectively. MALDI-TOF-MS and X-ray protein crystallography studies were consistent with 10z acting as a reversible-covalent inhibitor of FGFR4, serving as a promising lead compound for further anticancer drug development.

FGFR mRNA overexpression occurs frequently in cholangiocarcinoma in the absence of genetic FGFR alterations. This study identifies a molecular subpopulation in cholangiocarcinoma for which further investigation of FGFR inhibitors is merited outside currently approved indications.

Based on these results we concluded that, like the known FGFR2 mutation, this insertion is predicted to cause hyperactivity by inducing prolonged dimerization due to an aberrant inter-receptor disulfide bond but any structural or functional differences only occur when receptors are dimerized. We are currently generating isogenic cell line models to test this hypothesis and treat these cell lines with inhibitors to determine which treatments might work best for our patient.

Strikingly, clinical sequencing data showed amplification of MCL1 or BCL2L1 (encoding Bcl-xL) in subsets of FGFR mutation-negative bladder cancer tissues. In conclusion, these findings suggest that exploiting apoptosis pathways may be a promising treatment strategy for patients with FGFR wild-type metastatic urothelial cancer with Mcl-1 or Bcl-xL overexpression.

In vivo characterization to be presented includes dose escalating rodent pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics in tumor bearing mice, and efficacy in a mouse AN3 CA tumor xenograft model. Herein, the in vitro and in vivo characterization of a representative selective reversible FGFR2 inhibitor is described.

A trend toward a better response to cisplatin and checkpoint inhibitors was suggested favoring FGFR GA tumors...FGFR GAs are a relevant biomarker in mUC that could condition the response to systemic therapy. New prognostic models, including this molecular determination, should be designed and validated.

Cluster analysis of the different immunohistochemical and molecular parameters allowed a clear separation in two different clusters: cluster 1 corresponding to PUN-LMP and LG-PUC (low MIB-1 and mitotic count/FGFR3 and STAG2 mutations) and cluster 2, HG-PUC (high MIB-1 and mitosis count/CK20 +++ expression, FGFR3 WT and TP53 mutation). Further analysis is required to validate and analyze the reproducibility of these clusters and their biological and clinical implication.

Conclusions Despite the limitations affecting our study, this large-scale database analysis may support the design of appropriate prospective clinical trials and preclinical models to develop novel pharmacological approaches for UTUC patients. More efforts aimed at implementing UTUC genomics analysis are warranted.

Our studies also observed that FGFR3 wild-type cells promote UC cell radioresistance via purine biosynthesis and further activate the homologous recombination repair mechanism. Combining all evidence, we claim that purine biosynthesis should be focused and regarded as a novel strategy against UC.

FGFR1 is an actionable driver oncogene in NB and a promising therapy may consist in targeting FGFR1 mutations in patients with therapy-resistant NB.

Background: Several fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have been recently approved or are in development for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements (f/r), such as the ATP-competitive inhibitors pemigatinib and infigratinib (FDA-approved in 2020/2021) and the covalent inhibitor futibatinib, which has shown efficacy in a pivotal phase 2 trial. This analysis provides insight into the real-world characteristics, clinical management and outcomes among patients with iCCA and FGFR2 f/r, predominantly prior to the introduction of FGFR inhibitors, providing a baseline for further study as the treatment landscape evolves. Of note, the time lag between diagnosis and genomic testing before entry to CTCA underlines the need for earlier testing to guide optimal therapy in clinical practice.

This multi-center, multi-laboratory study showed that, regardless of the cut-off used, p53-immunohistochemistry did not enable selection of patients with worse outcome. Our results suggest that p53-immunohistochemistry alone is not suitable to guide clinical decision making after radical cystectomy.

FGFR1, FGF19, FGF23, FGF3, FGF4, and FGF6 amplifications were statistically different across subtypes (most prevalent in HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+) and metastatic sites (most prevalent in liver and bone metastases). The prevalence in HR+ subtypes lend support to the role of FGF in endocrine resistance.

In addition, CDX tumor models showed in vivo target engagement and FGFR isoform selectivity. Herein, the in vitro and in vivo characterization of a representative selective reversible FGFR2 inhibitor is described.

P2, N=80, Recruiting, TransThera Sciences (Nanjing), Inc. | Not yet recruiting --> Recruiting

These real-world overall survival findings did not demonstrate a survival advantage for patients with CCA and FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements vs. WT FGFR2 receiving therapies for advanced disease, although a non-significant trend towards longer overall survival was observed in patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. FGFR2 status was not a significant predictor of overall survival after adjusting for potential prognostic covariates.

Despite a better response to first line treatment, overall FGFR GA showed to be an independent risk factor in mUC. Thus, this determination should be included in new prognostic models. Univariable and multivariable analysis for overall survival in the first line treatment setting for mUC.