FAT1 mutation

They received postoperative treatment and were monitored for 20 and 26 months, showing good recovery. The phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of AS in pediatric population was expanded by these two patients, which requires the accumulating more cases to gain a deeper understanding.

Combination therapy with EGFR inhibitors and KN93 could be a novel precision therapeutic strategy and a potential clinical solution for EGFR-resistant OSCC patients with FAT1 mutations.

SSDH shows PI3K pathway alterations similar to those seen in other similar proliferative lesions of the breast (i.e., radial scar, infiltrating epitheliosis) and these lesions may possibly be classified as pre-neoplastic rather than hyperplastic. This finding may explain the rare association of SSDH with atypical hyperplasia/carcinoma.

A higher infiltration rate of immune cells including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages M1 and regulatory T cells were also observed in the colorectal tumors with FAT1 mutation compared to tumors with wild type FAT1. The results showed that CRC patients with FAT1 mutations exhibited an immunotherapy-favorable profile.

Whole-exome sequencing showed that DYNC1I2, THSD7A, and FAT1 mutations were associated with patient prognosis. Combination therapy involving tislelizumab plus nimotuzumab is a promising, low-toxicity treatment for recurrent or metastatic OSCC in patients with a PS score ≥ 2.

Cell line and patient-derived xenograft-based drug tests validated the specific therapeutic responses predicted by multi-omics subtyping. This study provides a valuable resource as well as insights to better understand SCLC biology and improve clinical practice.

The interplay between cancer driver genes and HOX genes is pivotal in regulating the oncogenic processes underlying the pathogenesis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

H3K27me3 is a useful diagnostic marker, while the loss of CD34 positive fibroblastic network can also be a diagnostic feature of MPNST. NF1 gene inactivation mutations and complete loss of PRC2 activity are the common molecular diagnostic features, but other less commonly recurred genomic aberrations might also contribute to the MPNST pathogenesis.

Conclusions In this cohort of locally advanced HPV-negative HNSCC, our NGS custom panel identified pathogenic variants in 83.3% of the tumors, but only in 20 % of preoperative ctDNA samples. Despite cfDNA increase after surgery, no pathogenic variant was identified in blood samples.

Our findings suggest that TERTp mutation is more frequent in young patients with advanced OTSCC and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, TERTp mutation may serve as a prognostic biomarker for OTSCC in young patients. The findings of this study may help in developing personalized treatment strategies for OTSCC based on age and genetic alterations.

Greater clinical benefit was consistently observed with T-DXd vs TPC independent of intrinsic subtype, ESR1 mutation, PIK3CA mutation, or known CDK4/6i resistance marker status. Clinical trial information: NCT03734029. >aIncluded only pts with prior CDK4/6i and ≥1 gene alternation (CCND1, CCNE1, CDK6, FGFR1/2 amplification; RB1, PTEN, RAS, AKT1, ERBB2, FAT1 mutation).

In the end-stage cystic kidney, proximal tubules and cysts showed an enrichment of driver mutations commonly found in papillary RCC and RCC with acquired cystic disease, reflecting the fact that the incidence of these two types of RCC increases as the duration of dialysis becomes longer. In addition, clear cell RCC drivers, such as VHL mutation and loss of chromosome 3, were not observed, possibly explaining the rare occurrence of clear cell RCC in hemodialysis patients. Since cysts had more frequent copy number alterations than remaining tubules, cysts in the end-stage kidney might be precursor lesions of RCC.

PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition, PI3Kalpha inhibitor, AKT inhibitor, FGFR inhibitor, ALK/IGF1R inhibitor, CDK4/6 inhibitor, BCl2 inhibitor, WEE1 inhibitor, ATR inhibitor, DNA-PK inhibitor, AT2AR inhibitor, Mcl-1 inhibitor, MEK1/2 inhibitor, EZH2 inhibitor, HDAC inhibitor, CDK9 inhibitor, DNMT3 inhibitor, BRD4/BET inhibitor, JAK2 inhibitor, CXCR4 inhibitor, FAK inhibitor, BTK inhibitor, eribulin, & VEGFR2/ PDGFR/FGFR or VEGFR2/c-MET/Axl triple blockage might be effective on TW2.6 and reverse treatment refractoriness, maybe through the inhibition of mesenchymal transformation, pRB, & PI3K/AKT /mTOR signaling and the modulation of stemness & PD1/PDL1 pathway...All cell lines will be tried to be categorized as TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations.Cell linesSCC25KBSASCAL27FaDuSCC15SCC9SCC4TW2.6Differ- entiationWellPoorPoorPoorPoorWellWellWellWell, but rapidly replicated, with high hyper-diploidy & complex rearrangementsHPV statusHPV 16/18HPV18--HPV 16/18--HPV 6/11-EGFR statusMediumLowHighHighMediumHighLowMedium to highUnknownDocetaxel sensitivity+++++++++++++ to +++++-+Cisplatin sensitivity+++++++++++++- to +-- to +5-FU sensitivity+++++++++++-+ to ++-- to +Afatinib sensitivity+++- to +-+++++ to +++++++++-Polo-like kinase Inhibitor sensitivity+++++++++++++ to +++- to +-- to +VEGFR2 Inhibitor sensitivity----+++++--++PI3K/ mTOR inhibitorAll cell lines sensitiveCDK4/6 Inhibitor response+++- to ++++++ to +++++++++++++ to +++Western blotsWeak p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 and BMI-1, Gli-1(+)Weak p-AKT, mild PDL1 and strong VEGF-A & BMI-1, p16(+)Moderate p-AKT & BMI-1, high PDL1, mild VEGF-AHigh p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 & BMI-1High VEGF-A, moderate p-AKT & PDL1, weak BMI-1, Gli-1(+)Weak p-AKT & VEGF-A, mild PDL1 & BMI-1Weak p-AKT, VEGF-A, & BMI-1, moderate PDL1Moderate p-AKT & VEGF-A, strong BMI-1, mild PDL1, Gli-1(+)High p-AKT, PDL1, & VEGF-A and moderate BMI-1NGSCCND1 gain, CDKN2A deletion, FRG1 mutation, HGF mutation, p53 mutation, ATR mutation, SMO mutation, RUNX1T1 mutationSTK11 mutation, PDGFRA mutation, IGF1 mutation, BCOR mutation, EGFR mutation, NOTCH1 mutation, MET mutation, IKZF1 mutation, NFKB1 mutation, DPYD mutation, FGFR4 mutation, BRCA1 mutation, MSH2 mutation, DNMT3A mutationKRAS mutation, MDM2 mutation, TMB-H, AXIN1 loss, RAD51D mutation, NOTCH1/2 mutation, ERBB4 mutation, PALB2 mutation, p53 mutation, POLE mutation, CASP8 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, RNF43 mutation, LRP1B mutation, MET mutationCDKN2A deletion, EGFR amplification, SMAD4 mutation, TMB-H, LRP1B mutation, APC mutation, CASP8 mutation, CREBBP mutation, PIK3CG mutation, NRAS mutation, ABL1 mutation, FGF23 mutation, HGF mutation, ATRX mutation, p53 mutation, ERBB2 mutation, ROS1 mutation, EP300 mutation, NRAS mutation, CDKN1A mutation, KDM6A mutation, FLT4 mutationCCND1 gain, CDKN2A deletion, FLCN mutation, TMB-H, LRP1B mutation, SMAD4 loss, SF3B1 mutation, FAT1 mutation, VHL mutation, NOTCH3 mutation, EPHA5 mutation, p53 mutation, ERCC2 mutationCCND1 gain, EGFR amplification, SMO mutation, ATR mutation, FAT1 loss, NTRK1 mutation, KMT2D mutation, p53 mutation, NOTCH3 mutationCDKN2A deletion, AXIN2 amplification, SMAD3 loss, HRAS mutation, ATR mutation, NF1 mutation. IGF1R mutation, FLCN mutation, KEAP1 mutation, ASXL1 mutation, PMS2 mutationCCND1 gain, NF1 loss, LRP1B mutation, NSD1 mutation, KMT2D mutation, p53 mutation, EPHA2 mutationFAT1 loss, CCND3/FGF10 amplification, PIK3CA H1047R mutation, STK11 mutation, RICTOR/FLCN amplification, VEGF-A amplification , TSC2 mutation, EPHB1 mutation, MAP2K4 mutation, KDM5A mutation, PDGFRB mutation, SETD2 mutation, RPTOR mutation, APC mutation, DDR2 mutation, ATM mutation, MDM2 mutation, p53 mutation, CDK12 mutation, HRAS mutation, MYC mutation, CDK8 mutation, ARID1B lossOutcomesBest; like TCGA CL (HPV+) subtypeLike TCGA basal subtype, but responded to particular treatments eachBasalBasalLike TCGA mesen-chymal subtype (HPV+)Like TCGA CL(HPV-) subtype, different characters between these 3 cell linesCL(HPV-) subtypeCL(HPV-) subtypeWorse; like TCGA EMT subtype (HPV-)Potential treatmentsAll sensitive maybe; Hedgehog inhibitor , HGF/c-MET inhibitor, and I/O could be tried(1) Taxane, cisplatin, PLKi (2) mTORi (3) IGF1Ri, METi, PDGFRi, FGFRi (4) Epigenetics (5) I/O(1) Taxane, cisplatin, 5-FU, PLKi (2) CDK4/6i (3) I/O (4) DDRi (5) KRASi, METi, HERi (6) p53 reactivator and MDM2/Mcl-1 inhibitor(1) Taxane, cisplatin, 5-FU, PLKi (2) CDK4/6i (3) Mild EGFRi response (4) I/O (5) NRASi, FGFRi, HGF/c-METi/ROS1i/HERi (6) p53 reactivator/DDRi/Epigenetics(1) Cisplatin, 5-FU (2) EGFRi and VEGFR2i (3) Weak to PLKi & CDK4/6i (4) I/O (5) mTORi (6) Ephi (7) DDR/Epigenetics (8) p53 reactivator (9) HIFi(1) Taxane and PLKi (2) EGFRi, VEGFR2i, CDK4/6i (3) NTRKi (4) Hedgehog inhibitor (5) DDRi, epigenetics,& p53 reactivator(1) Taxane &5-FU (2) EGFRi (3) HRASi (4) DDRi/Epigenetics (5) I/O (6) IGF1Ri (7) mTORi(1) EGFRi (2) CDK4/6i (3) I/O (4) Epigenetics (5) Ephi (6) p53 reactivator(1) CDK4/6 inhibitor (2) Multi-targeted VEGFR TKI (3) PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor (4) ICIs combination (5) p53 reactivator/ DDR interventions/Epigenetics (6) Dasatinib, HRASi, EphB1/B4 interventions Further NGS analysis may translate these HNSCC cell lines to represent TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations, esp... Further NGS analysis may translate these HNSCC cell lines to represent TCGA subtypes for the reference of future drug combinations, esp. immunotherapy, basic/translational research, and animal models. LRP1B will be a potential ICIs efficacy biomarker in HNSCC.

ZNF217 mutations were significantly associated with early-stage colorectal cancer. In all, this study represents a comprehensive genomic analysis uncovering potential molecular mechanisms underneath different subgroups of colorectal cancer thus providing new targets for precision treatment development.

FAT cadherin family genes are frequently mutated in CRC, and their mutation profile defines a subtype of CRC with favorable clinicopathologic characteristics.

In addition to phenotypic alterations due to FAT1 mutations, several signaling pathways and tumor immune systems known or proposed to be regulated by this protein are presented. The potential impact of detecting or targeting FAT1 mutations on cancer treatment is also prospectively discussed.

Genomic and immunologic analysis showed that a high mutational burden, increased infiltration of immune-response cells, decreased infiltration of immune-suppressive cells, interferon and cell cycle-related pathways were enriched in patients with FAT1 mutations. Our study revealed that FAT1 mutations were associated with better immunogenicity and ICI efficacy, which may be considered as a biomarker for selecting patients to receive immunotherapy.

Comprehensive proteomic and drug-screening studies across pan-cancer models confirm that FAT1-mutant HNSCC exhibits selective and higher sensitivity to BRD4 inhibition by JQ1. Epigenomic analysis reveals an active chromatin state in FAT1-mutant HNSCC cells that is driven by the YAP/TAZ transcriptional complex through recruitment of BRD4 to deposit active histone marks, thereby maintaining an oncogenic transcriptional state. This study reveals a detailed cooperative mechanism between YAP1 and BRD4 in HNSCC and suggests a specific therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of this subset of head and neck cancer patients.

Dual ErbB3-EGFR inhibition remains of scientific interest in HPV-negative HNSCC. Should more tolerable combinations be identified, development in an earlier line of therapy and prospective evaluation of the FAT1 hypothesis warrant consideration.

We found no difference in irradiated tumor progression among patients who did and did not have CH. There may be an association between CH and poor radiation outcomes in certain cancer types, and further studies are needed to clarify the specific clinical and genomic factors that may influence radiation response.

AFA+BEV after OSI resistance demonstrated moderate efficacy and favorable safety. A small portion of C797S pts exhibited the sensitivity. Higher potency was suggested in T790M/BRAF/KRAS/PIK3 mutation-negative and uncommon EGFR/HER2 mutation-positive pts.

Colorectal cancer patients with FAT1 mutations may benefit from immunotherapy. The increased immunogenicity in patients with FAT1 mutations may be due to increased immune cell infiltration.

It often presents late and is unresponsive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy...In addition to upregulated expression of EGFR, which has been suggested as a therapeutic target in basal/squamous bladder cancer, we identified expression signatures that indicate upregulated OSMR and YAP/TAZ signalling. Preclinical evaluation of the effects of inhibition of these pathways alone or in combination is merited.

FAT family genes are potential prognostic and immunological biomarkers and correlate with response to ICIs in NSCLC.

In addition, FAT1 signature was associated with the response to radiotherapy, advanced stage and human papilloma virus (HPV) status in HNSCC patients. In conclusion, the FAT1 gene signature was associated with prognosis of HNSCC and may help to provide personalized treatments for HNSCC patients.

HPV-independent carcinomas are more likely to be moderately-poorly differentiated with intermediate to high tumor cell budding. Cancer cell fraction analysis of HPV-independent squamous carcinomas suggests that TERT and/or NOTCH1 alterations along with TP53 alterations can be the initiating event in these tumors.

In squamous cancers of the lung and cervix, a strong association of FAT1 and EGFR gene expression was identified. Collectively, these results suggest that alteration of FAT1 appears to involve mostly HPV(-) HNSCC and may contribute to resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy.

Wnt inhibitor, Wnt974, were synergistic with methotrexate in killing well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines. TCGA data analyses reveal a signature in patients with well-differentiated HNSCC who have no benefits from metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that there might be novel nosology and therapeutic candidates for improving HNSCC patient survival. Well-differentiated OSCC is synergistically killed by combination chemotherapy with Wnt inhibitor, making it promising therapeutic candidates.

(4) Mutation in FAT1 may be a predictive biomarker in patients with NSCLC who exhibit NDB to ICBs. We proposed an FAT1 mutation-based model for screening more suitable NSCLC patients to receive ICBs that may contribute to individualized immunotherapy.

Clinically, the prevalence of FAT1 mutation was significantly associated with HPV(-), female, or older patients, and enriched in the oral cavity and larynx/hypopharynx primary tumor sites. FAT1 mutation was significantly associated with lower FAT1 gene expression and increased protein expression of HER3_pY1289, IRS1, CAVEOLIN1 and VEGFR2, while twelve proteins were upregulated in patients with wild type FAT1, including immune check point molecule PD1. Poorer OS or PFS was observed in patients with FAT1 mutation and/or altered HER3_pY1289, IRS1, CYCLINE2, RET_pY905, P16INK4A, CMYC, MTORpS2448, or CAVEOLIN.

TSC2 is an FDA-recognized predictive marker for everolimus in central nervous system cancer and RAD54L is an FDA-recognized predictive marker for olaparib in prostate cancer. Our data showed that MUC16, ARID1A and ADAMTSL1 were observed in more than half of nasal-type ENKTL. Our data showed that MUC16, ARID1A and ADAMTSL1 were observed in more than half of nasal-type ENKTL. Additional mutations can be found in recurrent tumors but the relationship between the acquisition of new mutations and the treatment received was still poorly understood. TSC2 and RAD54L mutations were identified in some recurrent tumors which may serve as potential therapeutic targets for ENKTL.

Palbociclib could reverse afatinib, docetaxel, & radiation resistance...CDK7/8/9/12/13 are involved in RNA polymerase II function with RNA elongation pause/release, transcription & onco-histones control, and SWI/SNF superfamily with epigenetic modifications. HNSCC cell lines(SCC4, SCC9, SCC15, SCC25, FaDu, KB, Cal27, SAS, and TW2.6, betel-nuts related) were tested in (1)in vitro sensitivity to CDK inhibitors; (2)synergistic effect of AZD4573(CDK9 inhibitor) with other therapies by MTT assay, colony formation, flow cytometry, & western blotting; (3) NGS studies to elucidate molecular mechanisms. Palbociclib response correlated to CCND1 gain & CDKN2A deletion; but FaDu had poor response with both and TW2.6 had good response without both... CCND1 gain & CDKN2A deletion could not fully predict CDK4/6 inhibitor response. TW2.6 is responsive to CDK4/6 inhibitors(palbociclib>ribociclib>abemaciclib). FAT1 loss, CCND3 amplification, PI3K/AKT/mTOR derangements, & FGFR amplification might imply CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance.

Our comprehensive analysis identified drug resistance and vulnerabilities in FAT1-deficient tumours, which have important implications for cancer therapy. Our studies reveal that, in mouse and human squamous cell carcinoma, loss of function of FAT1 promotes tumour initiation, progression, invasiveness, stemness and metastasis through the induction of a hybrid EMT state.