EML4-ALK variant 1

Detection rate by ctDNA profiling is higher compared with RNA-based approaches and it is of prognostic significance.

Combination treatment with lorlatinib and erlotinib significantly reduced HRG1-induced activation of RTK signaling in ALK-positive NSCLC cells. HER3 overexpression has potential as a prognostic marker in ALK-positive NSCLCs, including ALK-TKI naïve and treated cases, especially those with EML4-ALK V1/V2. Assessing HER3 expression may be crucial for treatment planning and outcome prediction in these patients.

These findings highlight the complexity of drug selection when treating patients harboring resistance mutations and suggest that the F1174S mutation in EML4-ALK variant 1 is likely not a potent oncogenic driver. Additional oncogenic driver or other resistance mechanisms should be considered in the case of EML4-ALK variant 1 with F1174S mutation.

Patients with untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC derived greater clinical benefits, with higher ORRs and potentially longer PFS, when treated with lorlatinib compared with crizotinib, independent of EML4::ALK variant or ALK mutations, TP53 mutations, or bypass resistance alterations.

MET-amplified, ALK + NSCLC often presents with high-level and heterogeneous amplification in tissue, seldom overlaps with ALK mutations, and frequently co-occurs with alterations associated with aggressive tumor biology.

Six ALK TKIs (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, ensartinib) have received first-line treatment indication of advanced ALK+ NSCLC in various countries. CNS AE occurred fewer than 1 per patient over the median follow-up time of 36.7 months and most resolved without intervention. Altogether these data affirm our belief that lorlatinib should be the treatment of choice of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

ALK-fusion transcripts can be detected in EV-enriched fractions. These results set the stage for the development of EV-based noninvasive ALK testing.

This exploratory analysis highlights the potential role of NGS in improving our understanding of response and resistance to ceritinib. It also illustrates that ceritinib is active against almost all ALK resistance mutations found in ALKi-pretreated patients.

Importantly, it also significantly decreases cancer malignant transformation and tumor formation. These data together highlight an important role of phase separation in orchestrating EML4-ALK signaling and promoting tumorigenesis, which might provide new clues for the development of clinical therapeutic strategies in treating lung cancer patients with the EML4-ALK fusion.

dPCR assay is a precise method with good performance at detecting EML4-ALK variants in synthetic sequences and cell line, which is more sensitive than RT-PCR. However, EML4-ALK variants could not be detected in the majority of our plasma samples. This may be due to insufficient circulating RNAs for detection.

EML4-ALK fusions can be detected at the RNA levels and at the protein levels analyzing EVs derived from H3122 and H2228 cell lines. These results set the stage for the development of EV-based non-invasive ALK testing in NSCLC patients.

This study illustrated the patterns of EML4-ALK fusion variants and gene profiles in patients with resected NSCLC. Advanced T stage and EML4-ALK variant 3 were associated with worse prognosis. The role of TP53 mutations in prognosis is worthy of further study.