O07 Serious infection risk with systemic treatments for psoriasis: a cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). (PubMed, Br J Dermatol)
Inclusion criteria were adults who received at least one of the biologics, apremilast or conventional nonbiologics (acitretin, ciclosporin and methotrexate) for ≥ 6 months. All biologics licensed for psoriasis were analysed except for infliximab, which had higher prescription criteria...The certolizumab group had a low mean age of 37.4 years (SD 10.3), the ustekinumab group had a significantly longer median treatment duration of over 4 years (IQR 1.83-6.73), and more patients in the ixekizumab (42.6%) and certolizumab (40.6%) groups had concomitant psoriatic arthritis...IRs (95% CIs) of other tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors were 15.7 (14.5-17.1) for adalimumab and 16.7 (13.8-20.0) for etanercept. For interleukin-17 inhibitors the IRs (95% CIs) were 18.4 (15.9-21.2) for secukinumab, 7.63 (0.92-27.6) for bimekizumab, 14.5 (7.73-24.8) for brodalumab and 18.5 (14.0-24.0) for ixekizumab. For interleukin-23 inhibitors the IRs (95% CIs) were 13.5 (9.97-17.8) for guselkumab, 13.8 (9.10-20.1) for risankizumab and 17.2 (7.43-33.9) for tildrakizumab...In this analysis, we observed a low incidence of serious infections across treatment groups. The Cox proportional hazards analysis with propensity scores and inverse probability treatment weighting to account for differences in potential confounders would provide further insights into the relative risk of serious infection.