BCL2L11 deletion

The BDP conferred almost complete resistance to cell death induced by imatinib in CML stem and progenitor cells (LSPCs). Using BH3 profiling, we identified a novel therapeutic vulnerability of BDP LSPCs to MCL-1 antagonists, which we confirmed in primary human LSPCs, and in vivo. Our findings demonstrate the impact of human polymorphisms on the survival of LSPCs and highlight their potential as companion diagnostics for tailored therapies.

Because continuous inhibition of BCL-XL causes thrombocytopenia, we proposed and tested an interrupted 4 days ON / 3 days OFF treatment regimen, which retained the desired anti-tumor synergy with manageable platelet toxicity. The proposed VEN and A1155463 combination represents an innovative chemotherapy-free regimen with significant preclinical activity across diverse BCL2-positive hematologic malignancies irrespective of the BCL1L11/BIM status.

While the BRAFV600E inhibitor encorafenib in combination with the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab (Enc+Cet) was recently approved for this indication, overall survival is only increased by 3.6 months and objective responses are observed in only 20% of patients. Combining encorafenib with DT2216 significantly increased apoptosis induction in vitro, while combining encorafenib with AZD0466 was well tolerated in mice and further reduced growth of BRAFV600E CRC xenografts compared to either agent alone. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that combined BRAF and BCL-XL inhibition significantly enhances apoptosis in pre-clinical models of BRAFV600E CRC and is a combination regimen worthy of clinical investigation to improve outcomes for these patients.

Long CD74/SLC34A2-ROS1 fusions, which retain transmembrane regions in ROS1 and fusion partners, are associated with poor response to crizotinib independent of TP53 mutations.

Furthermore, we expect most relevance from the ABCG2 34 G>A and CYP1A1 variations during erlotinib and gefitinib treatment. Pre-emptive CYP2D6 testing before starting gefitinib treatment can also be considered to prevent severe drug-related toxicity. These and other germline variations are summarized and discussed, in order to provide clear recommendations for clinical practice.

EGFR-TKIs plus Bev conferred a significantly higher ORR and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and BIMdel. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

The young lung cancer group had more potential treatment choices. Although young lung patients had better outcomes, there were still adverse factors of them, suggesting that the young group still needs more caution for treatment choice and monitoring after the treatment to further improve the prognosis.

Patients with deletion polymorphism had lower ORR (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.85, P = 0.004) and DCR (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38-0.90, P = 0.014) compared with those without deletion. BIM deletion polymorphism may confer resistance to EGFR-TKIs and can be used as a biomarker to predict treatment response to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients from Asian populations.

The resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are heterogeneous and gradually perfected. The combination of osimertinib with bypass targeted therapy and other therapeutic approaches emerge as promising strategies.

BIM-del is associated with poor clinical responses and outcomes, and might be a negative predictive and prognostic biomarker in EGFR T790 M NSCLC patients with osimertinib treatment.

Neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI appears to be more effective than conventional chemotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. This study provides evidence that needs to be investigated further in randomized controlled trials (RCT).

In comparison with PC-9 cells, PC-9 BIMi2- / - cells were less sensitive to apoptosis mediated by EGFR-TKIs such as gefitinib and osimertinib. Invest. 67 : 343-350, August, 2020.

In this retrospective study, of 1,312 patients with unresectable NSCLC treated at Higashi-Hiroshima Medical Center and Hiroshima University Hospital between April 1994 and October 2019, we enrolled those underwent CRT or chemotherapy using carboplatin + paclitaxel or cisplatin + vinorelbine, or anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment. In conclusion, we showed that BIM polymorphism was a poor-predictive factor for anti-tumor effects in NSCLC patients who underwent CRT, specifically radiotherapy. In the implementation of CRT in patients with BIM polymorphism, we should consider the subsequent treatment, keeping in mind that CRT may be insufficient.

BIM polymorphism does not affect EGFR-TKI efficacy.

In addition, we identify that the BIA compound, a potentialTMBIM6 antagonist, prevents TMBIM6 binding to mTORC2, decreases mTORC2 activity, and also regulates TMBIM6-leaky Ca, further suppressing tumor formation and progression in cancer xenograft models. This previously unknown signaling cascade in which mTORC2 activity is enhanced via the interaction with TMBIM6 provides potential therapeutic targets for various malignancies.

Legal entity responsible for the study: Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Funding: Has not received any funding.