AR T877A

Especially, 4a showed superior efficacy against ARF876L/T877A and ARW741C mutants compared to darolutamide and enzalutamide. Moreover, 4a exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic profiles (F = 66.24%) in vivo and significant tumor growth inhibition in an LNCaP xenograft mouse model upon oral administration. These results highlight the potential of 4a as a promising oral AR antagonist for overcoming drug resistance in PCa.

Our results also show the differences and equivalences between the different agonists, in addition to evaluating the difference between the DHT ligand in complex with the wild-type and mutant receptor, presenting the main amino acid residues that involve the interaction with the ligands. The computational methodology used proves to be an operative and sophisticated choice to help in the search for pharmacological agents for various therapies that have androgen as a target.

Our findings suggest that the resistance to bicalutamide is partially due to increased flexibility in the H helix, which disturbs the compactness, thereby reducing the affinity for bicalutamide. In conclusion, the current study helps in understanding the structural changes caused by mutations and could assist in the drug development process.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

As expected, only CRPC patients were positive for AR amplification, while interestingly the T877A mutation was identified in two patients still considered HSPC at the time. The ddPCR based analysis of AR alterations in cfDNA is highly economic, feasible, and informative to provide biomarker detection that may help to decide on the best follow-up therapy for CRPC patients.

Herein, systemic structural modifications on the C-3, C-6, and C-17 positions of galeterone led to the discovery of 67-b with the dual functions of AR antagonism and degradation. In vivo, 67-b effectively inhibited the growth of hormone-sensitive organs in the Hershberger assay and exhibited tumor regression in the enzalutamide-resistant (c4-2b-ENZ) xenograft model. These results confirmed 67-b to be a promising AR degrader and antagonist for the treatment of mCRPC patients.

This shows that the binding of LPXN is increased by these mutations which consequently increase the PCa invasion and motility. In conclusion, the current study helps in understanding the protein networks and particular the coupling of AR-LPXN in prostate cancer and is of great interest in deciphering the molecular mechanism of disease and therapeutics developments.

As expected, only CRPC patients were positive for AR amplification, while interestingly the T877A mutation was identified in two patients still considered HSPC at the time. The ddPCR based analysis of AR alterations in cfDNA is highly economic, feasible, and informative to provide biomarker detection that may help to decide on the best follow-up therapy for CRPC patients.

In this study, we have identified a potential hit molecule for AR antagonism that could be further developed to obtain a potent clinical candidate.

First-generation nonsteroidal androgen receptor (AR) antagonists, such as flutamide (2a) and bicalutamide (3), are effective for most prostate cancer patients, but resistance often appears after several years due to the mutation of AR. Selected coumarinamide derivatives showed AR-antagonistic activity toward LNCaP cells with T877A AR, and they had weak progesterone receptor (PR)-antagonistic activity. The folded coumarinamide structure appears to be a unique pharmacophore, different from those of conventional AR antagonists.