^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Resistant: C3 – Early Trials
Source:
Title:

Randomized phase II study of pembrolizumab (P) alone versus pegilodecakin (PEG) in combination with P as first-line (1L) therapy in patients (pts) with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high PD-L1 expression (CYPRESS 1).

Published date:
05/13/2020
Excerpt:
...101 pts were randomized to PEG+P (n=51) or P (n=50)….Results for PEG+P versus P were: ORR per investigator was 47% v. 44% (p=0.76), ORR per BICR was 53% v. 46%(p=0.78), mPFS per investigator was 6.3 v. 6.1 months with HR=0.94 (95% CI [0.54, 1.63];p=0.82), mPFS per BICR was 6.4 v. 7.2 months with HR=1.10 (95%CI [0.62, 1.96]; p=0.74), and mOS was 16.3 months v. not reached with HR = 1.36 (95% CI [0.66, 2.77]; p-value=0.40)....Adding PEG to P did not lead to improvement in ORR, PFS, or OS, in 1L advanced NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.PEG+P arm demonstrated expected safety profile but overall higher toxicity compared to pembrolizumab alone.
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9563
Trial ID: