^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: B - Late Trials
Title:

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): 3-year follow-up from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial.

Published date:
02/13/2023
Excerpt:
Pts were randomized 1:1 (stratified by IMDC risk score, tumor PD-L1 expression, region) to N 240 mg flat dose IV Q2W + C 40 mg PO QD vs SUN 50 mg PO for 4 wk (6-wk cycles)...ORR (95% CI) was higher with N+C vs S (56% [50–61] vs 28% [24–34]), and 12% vs 5% of pts achieved complete response (CR), respectively. Median duration of response was 23.1 vs 15.2 mo for N+C vs S. PFS, OS, and response are reported across prespecified IMDC risk groups...Responses with N+C were durable, with higher CR rates with N+C vs S regardless of IMDC risk group.
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.603
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: B - Late Trials
Title:

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Accepts for Priority Review Applications for OPDIVO® (nivolumab) in Combination with CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Published date:
10/19/2020
Excerpt:
...Bristol Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) and Exelixis, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXEL) today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) and supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA), respectively, for OPDIVO® (nivolumab) in combination with CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).... The FDA granted Priority Review to both applications and assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date, or target action date, of February 20, 2021.
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: B - Late Trials
Source:
Title:

696O_PR Nivolumab + cabozantinib vs sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: First results from the randomized phase III CheckMate 9ER trial

Published date:
09/01/2020
Excerpt:
N+C significantly improved PFS (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.41e0.64], P < 0.0001; median, 16.6 v 8.3 mo) and OS (HR 0.60 [98.89% CI 0.40e0.89]; P ¼ 0.0010; medians not reached) v S, and results were consistent across prespecified IMDC risk and PD-L1 subgroups.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2257
Trial ID: