^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
Title:

Study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy(SBRT) Followed by Atezolizumab / Tiragolumab in Treatment-naive Patients With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Excerpt:
...PD-L1 expression 1% 6....
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
Title:

A Study of Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab Compared With Placebo in Combination With Atezolizumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic PD-L1-Selected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Excerpt:
...- High tumor tissue PD-L1 expression...
Trial ID:
More C2 evidence
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Title:

Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab versus placebo plus atezolizumab as a first-line treatment for PD-L1-selected non-small-cell lung cancer (CITYSCAPE): primary and follow-up analyses of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study

Published date:
05/13/2022
Excerpt:
Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab showed a clinically meaningful improvement in objective response rate and progression-free survival compared with placebo plus atezolizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive, PD-L1-positive, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00226-1
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Source:
Title:

Primary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, phase II study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab (tira) plus atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo plus atezo as first-line (1L) treatment in patients with PD-L1-selected NSCLC (CITYSCAPE).

Published date:
05/13/2020
Excerpt:
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients (pts) with chemotherapy-naïve PD-L1+ (TPS ≥ 1% by 22C3 IHC pharmDx Dako assay) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC...At primary analysis (30 Jun 2019), TA improved ORR and median PFS (mPFS) compared to PA, with median follow-up of 5.9 mo...With an additional six months of follow-up since the primary analysis (2 Dec 2019, median follow-up of 10.9 mo), improvement in ORR and mPFS was maintained in ITT for TA (37.3% [25.0, 49.6] and 5.6 mo [4.2, 10.4]) vs PA (20.6% [10.2, 30.9] and 3.9 mo [2.7, 4.5]).
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9503
Trial ID: