^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
New
Source:
Title:

Phase II Trial of Ixazomib and Dexamethasone Versus Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide, Randomized with NFKB2 Rearrangement. (Proteasome Inhibitor NFKB2 Rearrangement Driven Trial, PINR)

Published date:
11/04/2021
Excerpt:
At the moment of the interim analysis, 60 patients have achieved 4 cycles of treatment. All treatment groups (NFKB2 FISH [-] Id, n=27, NFKB2 FISH [+] Id, n=20 and IRd, n=19) received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. A trend to higher ORR was observed in NFKB2 FISH negative treated with Id compared with NFKB2 FISH positive (41% CI:58%-97% vs. 30% CI:8%-60%, P=0.4, target p-value goal 0.15), including significantly higher rates of ≥ very good partial response, ≥ partial response, ≥ minimal response (15%, 25%, 15% vs. 4%, 25%, 10%, respectively). ORR for IRd arm is for now 57% CI:27%-80%.Interim analysis demonstrates a trend higher efficacy and ≥G3 toxicity of ixazomib with dexamethasone in MM patients with negative NFKB2 break-apart FISH compared to those with a positive test.
DOI:
10.1182/blood-2018-99-119337
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C4 – Case Studies
Source:
Title:

Phase II Trial of Ixazomib and Dexamethasone Versus Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide, Randomized with NFKB2 Rearrangement. (Proteasome Inhibitor NFKB2 Rearrangement Driven Trial, PINR)

Published date:
11/16/2018
Excerpt:
Patients without NFKB2 rearrangement received Id and patients with NFKB2 rearrangement were subsequently randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive Id or IRd...A higher ORR was observed in NFKB2 FISH negative treated with Id compared with NFKB2 FISH positive (56.3% CI:29.9%-80.3% vs. 16.7% CI:0.4%-64.1%, P=0.16), including significantly higher rates of ≥very good partial response, ≥ partial response, ≥ minimal response (12%, 37.5%, 6% vs. 0%, 0%, 16%, respectively)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-119337
Trial ID: