^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Source:
Title:

Efficacy of Ipilimumab vs FOLFOX in Combination With Nivolumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With Previously Untreated ERBB2-Positive Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: The AIO INTEGA Randomized Clinical Trial

Published date:
08/01/2022
Excerpt:
Central post hoc biomarker analysis (84 patients) showed PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score of 1 or greater in 59 patients (72%) and 5 or greater in 46 patients (56%) and confirmed ERBB2 positivity in 76 patients. The observed overall survival rate at 12 months was 70% (95% CI, 54%-81%) with FOLFOX and 57% (95% CI, 41%-71%) with ipilimumab...In this randomized clinical trial, trastuzumab, nivolumab, and FOLFOX showed favorable efficacy compared with historical data and trastuzumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab in ERBB2-positive EGA.
Secondary therapy:
FOLFOX
DOI:
10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2228
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Source:
Title:

LBA54 - Ipilimumab or FOLFOX in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in previously untreated HER2 positive locally advanced or metastastic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA): Results of the randomized phase II INTEGA trial (AIO STO 0217)

Published date:
09/13/2021
Excerpt:
The INTEGA trial compared different immunotherapy regimens in 1st line HER2+ EGA....The 1° endpoint of 70% OSR@12 was reached in arm B, but not in arm A (57%)...Trast/nivo/FOLFOX showed increased efficacy compared to the ToGA regimen, whereas trast/nivo/ipi did not improve OS over trast/chemo.
Secondary therapy:
FOLFOX
Trial ID: