^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: B - Late Trials
Source:
Title:

2362MO - Erdafitinib (erda) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) with select FGFR alterations (FGFRalt): Subgroups from the phase III THOR study

Published date:
10/16/2023
Excerpt:
Pts (≥18 y) with unresectable advanced/mUC and select FGFR3/2alt (mutations/fusions)...Primary end point was met: mOS 12.1 vs 7.8 mo in erda vs chemo (HR=0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88). OS benefit was seen across subgroups (Table). Erda improved mPFS (6 vs 3 mo) and ORR (46% vs 12%) vs chemo...In pts with FGFRalt advanced/mUC after prior anti-PD-(L)1 tx, erda significantly improved OS vs chemo. Clinically relevant subgroups showed a consistent OS benefit for erda. No new safety signals were observed.
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
New
Title:

Erdafitinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Excerpt:
The patients were required to have at least one FGFR3 mutation or FGFR2/3 fusion...Among the 25 patients with FGFR fusions, the response rate was 16%.
DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa1817323