^
Association details:
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Source:
Title:

Neoadjuvant atezolizumab for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm phase II trial

Published date:
09/12/2022
Excerpt:
The primary end point was major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable malignant cells) in resected tumors without EGFR or ALK alterations….With a minimum duration of follow-up of 3 years, the 3-year survival rate of 80% was encouraging....This study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in a large cohort of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer was safe and met its primary end point of MPR ≥ 15%.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01962-5
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Source:
Title:

Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Published date:
10/30/2017
Excerpt:
Our objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of all second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for EGFR by a systematic review and network meta-analysis....For OS, nivolumab was more effective than docetaxel (hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.56–0.83), pemetrexed (0.67, 0.52–0.83), erlotinib (0.68, 0.53–0.86), and gefitinib (0.66, 0.53–0.83). Pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and pemetrexed plus erlotinib were also significantly more effective than docetaxel, pemetrexed, erlotinib, and gefitinib.
DOI:
10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x