^
Association details:
Biomarker:EGFR expression
Cancer:Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Drug:erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor)
Direction:Sensitive
Evidence:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: B - Late Trials
New
Title:

Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study

Excerpt:
PFS was also significantly longer in patients with EGFR-positive immunohistochemistry who were treated with erlotinib (n=307) compared with EGFR-positive patients given placebo…
DOI:
10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70112-1
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

Study of Tarceva and Targretin in Stage I-II Lung Cancer

Excerpt:
...Number of Participants With Change in Expression Level of EGFR.`...
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

Study of Polyphenon E in Addition to Erlotinib in Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Excerpt:
...Phase I: Response rate`Phase 1: Progression Free Survival`Phase 2: Progression Free Survival`Phase 2: Overall Survival`Phase 2: Correlation between level of EGFR expression on the original tumor tissue and the presence of EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19 and 21 in serum DNA and original tumor tissue with the treatment response and outcome.`...
Trial ID:
More C2 evidence
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

Erlotinib and Radiation Therapy Plus Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Inoperable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Excerpt:
...Response assessed using RECIST`Level of EGFR expression...
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

Evaluate Erlotinib Efficacy and Safety as the 2nd/3rd Treatment in NSCLC With EGFR M(-) and C-met(-)

Excerpt:
...Neither with EGFR mutation nor c-met expression on Ventana Benchmark instrument(...
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

Erlotinib as First-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) for Patients Unfit for Chemotherapy

Excerpt:
...Correlation of EGFR expression rate and FISH potentially predictive for response...
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

Study of Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Excerpt:
...- Request archival diagnostic tissue for EGFR expression but...
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

A Prospective Observational Study Evaluating c-MET Expression and EGFR Gene Mutation Correlation With Erlotinib Response

Excerpt:
...To investigate C-met expression/amplification and EGFR gene mutations in NSCLC patients treated with Erlotinib : C-met expression by IHC C-met amplification by SISH EGFR mutation by real time PCR`The rates of C-met expression/amplification and EGFR gene mutations...
Trial ID:
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C2 – Inclusion Criteria
New
Title:

A Phase II Trial of Erlotinib as first line therapy in Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer over-expressing EGFR

Excerpt:
...Histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, Stage IIIb/IVImmunocytochemical evidence of EGFR over expression (++ or +++) from diagnostic tissue (e.g. bronchoscopic tumour samples core biopsies, fine needle aspirates-FNA).Life expectancy of at least 12 weeksWorld Health Organisation (WHO) performance status of 0-2 Haematological and biochemical indices within the ranges shown below. ...
Less C2 evidence
Evidence Level:
Sensitive: C3 – Early Trials
Title:

Nationwide Real-world Cohort Study of First-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Published date:
05/22/2020
Excerpt:
...treatment, and survival for 873 patients with stage IV EGFR + NSCLC, diagnosed from 2015 through 2017….Compared with erlotinib, OS was worse for gefitinib users (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.64), predominantly in patients with brain metastasis....In patients with brain metastasis, erlotinib showed superior results compared with gefitinib and was similar to afatinib.
DOI:
10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.019